Empowering communities? Exploring roles in facilitated social enterprise

Eilidh Finlayson · Michael James Roy

38 citations0/0 files storedSocial enterprise journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences Community and Sustainable Development Social Sciences and Governance

Abstract

Purpose States and development bodies are increasingly stimulating social enterprise activity in communities as an empowering social and economic development intervention. This type of development initiative is often facilitated by actors who are external to communities, and the role of community members is not clear. This paper aims to explore whether facilitated social enterprise benefits or disempowers communities. Design/methodology/approach The focus is a case study of a project based in Scotland designed to stimulate the creation of social enterprises involved in community growing. The case study approach involved a mix of methods, including formal (semi-structured) interviews, participant observation and analysis of documentary evidence. Analysis of findings was undertaken using Muñoz and Steinerowski’s (2012) theory of social entrepreneurial behaviour. Findings Findings suggest that social enterprise that originates outside communities and is facilitated by external actors is potentially disempowering, particularly when social enterprise development does not necessarily align with community needs. The paper reiterates findings in previous studies that certain roles in facilitated social enterprise require to be community-led. Projects that do attempt to facilitate social enterprise would benefit from community participation at the project planning stage. Originality/value If facilitated social enterprise is increasingly promoted as an empowering development intervention, this paper provides insight about how facilitated social enterprise occurs in practice and gives preliminary information about possible barriers to empowerment using this approach to development.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 38 citations exist upstream.

References

2006Using thematic analysis in psychology 2025The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers 1996The Art of Case Study Research 2008A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges 1946Trade and Industry 2005Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept 2007Social Entrepreneurship: The Case for Definition 2004The Marketization of the Nonprofit Sector: Civil Society at Risk?

Cited by

2024Enhancing inclusive entrepreneurial activity through community engagement led by higher education institutions 2023Challenging the assumptions of social entrepreneurship education and repositioning it for the future: wonders of cultural, social, symbolic and economic capitals 2022Sustainability in Social Enterprise Research: A Systematic Literature Review 2022Community, capabilities, and the social entrepreneurship ecosystem 2021Community forest enterprises and social enterprises: the confluence of two streams of literatures for sustainable natural resource management

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.