Citation map · Study

A cross-sectional study of the reporting quality of pilot or feasibility trials in high-impact anesthesia journals

16 references·3 citing·49 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.7,009 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials3,824 cited
2016CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials3,394 cited
2010What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy1,482 cited
2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials1,426 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials.489 cited
2003UNDERSTANDING THE LIMITATIONS OF THE JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR298 cited
2004Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.275 cited
2005The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement216 cited
2005Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study209 cited
2013A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature193 cited
2010Association between framing of the research question using the PICOT format and reporting quality of randomized controlled trials119 cited
2010Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

References

Cited by