Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Individual participant data meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes: A comparison of approaches for specifying and estimating one‐stage models

16 references·6 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
2011Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses2,872 cited
2010Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting1,701 cited
1993Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference?769 cited
2001A refined method for the meta‐analysis of controlled clinical trials with binary outcome764 cited
2005Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice557 cited
2016Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ537 cited
2014Random-Effects Meta-analysis of Inconsistent Effects: A Time for Change452 cited
2002A simple confidence interval for meta‐analysis424 cited
1993A bivariate approach to meta‐analysis327 cited
2004Meta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level, but not patient-level, factors245 cited
2016Random effects meta‐analysis: Coverage performance of 95 % confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation235 cited
2018A comparison of seven random‐effects models for meta‐analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio203 cited
2013Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis for a Binary Outcome: One-Stage or Two-Stage?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

201 cited

2015A decade of individual participant data meta-analyses: A review of current practice132 cited

2013Individual participant data meta-analyses should not ignore clustering130 cited

Cited by

2021Toward Cumulative Cognitive Science: A Comparison of Meta-Analysis, Mega-Analysis, and Hybrid Approaches31 cited
2020Meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes: Using pseudo IPD created from aggregate data to adjust for baseline imbalance and assess treatment‐by‐baseline modification26 cited
2020Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data of Single-Case Experimental Designs: One-Stage versus Two-Stage Methods26 cited
2018One‐stage random effects meta‐analysis using linear mixed models for aggregate continuous outcome data25 cited
2022MA ‐cont:pre/post effect size: An interactive tool for the meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes using R Shiny21 cited
2019Conducting one-stage IPD meta-analysis: which approach should I choose?10 cited