THE SIGNIFICANCE ARGUMENT FOR THE IRREDUCIBILITY OF CONSCIOUSNESS

Adam Pautz

40 citations0/0 files storedPhilosophical Perspectives

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophy and Theoretical Science Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Philosophy and History of Science

Abstract

Should [reductionism about consciousness] convince us that the line between the conscious and the non-conscious is of no great metaphysical significance?--John Hawthorne ( 2006)What might a philosophy might be like that began to give up all reductionist dreams?--Hilary Putnam (1992)

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 40 citations exist upstream.

References

1981Reason, Truth and History 1987Psychosemantics 2002Knowledge and its Limits 1995Naturalizing The Mind 1968A MATERIALIST THEORY OF THE MIND 2011Writing the Book of the World 2000Consciousness, Color, and Content 2000The Skeptic and the Dogmatist

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.