SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Decoupling the academic book
16 references·1 citing·39 second hop
Decoupling the academic book (2018)Decoupling the academic bookOperas Open Access Business Models White Paper (2018)Operas Open Access Business M…Unlocking the Digital Potential of Scholarly Monographs in 21st Century Research (2017)Unlocking the Digital Potenti…Peer review: The experience and views of early career researchers (2017)Peer review: The experience a…Open-access mega-journals (2017)Open-access mega-journalsMonitoring the transition to open access (2017)Monitoring the transition to …Heavyweight funders back central site for life-sciences preprints (2017)Heavyweight funders back cent…Cost estimates of an open access mandate for monographs in the UK’s third Research Excellence Framework (2017)Cost estimates of an open acc…The Costs of Publishing Monographs: Toward a Transparent Methodology (2016)The Costs of Publishing Monog…Making the future of scholarly communications (2016)Making the future of scholarl…How readers discover content in scholarly publications (2016)How readers discover content …Open Access and the Humanities (2014)Open Access and the HumanitiesChanges in the role of the commissioning editor in academic book publishing (2014)Changes in the role of the co…The big one: The epistemic system break in scholarly monograph publishing (2012)The big one: The epistemic sy…Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science (2012)Reinventing discovery: the ne…Open Access (2012)Open AccessDecoupling the scholarly journal (2012)Decoupling the scholarly jour…The challenge of assessing academic books: The U.K. and Lithuanian cases through the ISBN lens (2024)The challenge of assessing ac…Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Predicting the Future with Social Media (2010)Twitter mood predicts the stock market (2011)Open Evaluation: A Vision for Entirely Transparent Post-Publication Peer Review and Rating for Science (2012)Openness and archaeology's information ecosystem (2012)Transparency in Decision Modelling: What, Why, Who and How? (2019)Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy (2020)Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review (2020)Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review (2023)Empirical research in on-line trust: a review and critical assessment (2003)On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model (2003)Bias in peer review (2012)Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early-career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts (2019)What does better peer review look like? Underlying principles and recommendations for better practice (2019)Overburdening of peer reviewers: A multi‐stakeholder perspective on causes and effects (2021)Too much to know: managing scholarly information before the modern age (2011)Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure (2012)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)ITK: enabling reproducible research and open science (2014)Why should we promote public engagement with science? (2014)Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science (2015)How is open access accused of being predatory? The impact of Beall's lists of predatory journals on academic publishing (2020)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges (2023)The future of academic publishing: Revolution or evolution revisited (2019)Descubrir, leer, publicar, compartir y monitorizar el progreso: comportamiento de los investigadores junior españoles (2020)Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review (2018)Scaling Small; Or How to Envision New Relationalities for Knowledge Production (2021)Toward Open Research: A Narrative Review of the Challenges and Opportunities for Open Humanities (2021)Motivations, understandings, and experiences of open‐access mega‐journal authors: Results of a large‐scale survey (2019)The Two-Way Street of Open Access Journal Publishing: Flip It and Reverse It (2019)Publishing at any cost: a cross-sectional study of the amount that medical researchers spend on open access publishing each year (2021)Is multilingualism seen as added-value in bibliodiversity?: A literature review focussed on business and research contexts (2019)The case for an inclusive scholarly communication infrastructure for social sciences and humanities (2020)Open Access Monographs (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science645 cited
  • 2012Open Access625 cited
  • 2014Open Access and the Humanities223 cited
  • 2017Open-access mega-journals138 cited
  • 2012Decoupling the scholarly journal85 cited
  • 2017Peer review: The experience and views of early career researchers77 cited
  • 2016The Costs of Publishing Monographs: Toward a Transparent Methodology64 cited
  • 2017Monitoring the transition to open access44 cited
  • 2018Operas Open Access Business Models White Paper36 cited
  • 2016How readers discover content in scholarly publications29 cited
  • 2017Cost estimates of an open access mandate for monographs in the UK’s third Research Excellence Framework25 cited
  • 2012The big one: The epistemic system break in scholarly monograph publishing22 cited
  • 2017Heavyweight funders back central site for life-sciences preprints16 cited
  • 2017Unlocking the Digital Potential of Scholarly Monographs in 21st Century Research12 cited
  • 2016Making the future of scholarly communications8 cited
  • 2014Changes in the role of the commissioning editor in academic book publishing

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

7 cited

Cited by

  • 2024The challenge of assessing academic books: The U.K. and Lithuanian cases through the ISBN lens7 cited