Detecting racial bias in algorithms and machine learning

Nicol Turner Lee

260 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Artificial Intelligence in Law

Abstract

Purpose The online economy has not resolved the issue of racial bias in its applications. While algorithms are procedures that facilitate automated decision-making, or a sequence of unambiguous instructions, bias is a byproduct of these computations, bringing harm to historically disadvantaged populations. This paper argues that algorithmic biases explicitly and implicitly harm racial groups and lead to forms of discrimination. Relying upon sociological and technical research, the paper offers commentary on the need for more workplace diversity within high-tech industries and public policies that can detect or reduce the likelihood of racial bias in algorithmic design and execution. Design/methodology/approach The paper shares examples in the US where algorithmic biases have been reported and the strategies for explaining and addressing them. Findings The findings of the paper suggest that explicit racial bias in algorithms can be mitigated by existing laws, including those governing housing, employment, and the extension of credit. Implicit, or unconscious, biases are harder to redress without more diverse workplaces and public policies that have an approach to bias detection and mitigation. Research limitations/implications The major implication of this research is that further research needs to be done. Increasing the scholarly research in this area will be a major contribution in understanding how emerging technologies are creating disparate and unfair treatment for certain populations. Practical implications The practical implications of the work point to areas within industries and the government that can tackle the question of algorithmic bias, fairness and accountability, especially African-Americans. Social implications The social implications are that emerging technologies are not devoid of societal influences that constantly define positions of power, values, and norms. Originality/value The paper joins a scarcity of existing research, especially in the area that intersects race and algorithmic development.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 260 citations exist upstream.

References

2017Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases 2016Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy 2012Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook 2017Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness

Cited by

2021Ethics-Based Auditing of Automated Decision-Making Systems: Nature, Scope, and Limitations 2022Beyond bias and discrimination: redefining the AI ethics principle of fairness in healthcare machine-learning algorithms 2023Artificial Intelligence and Economic Development: An Evolutionary Investigation and Systematic Review 2022Allying with AI? Reactions toward human-based, AI/ML-based, and augmented hiring processes 2021The Ethics of Algorithms: Key Problems and Solutions 2021Discrimination in the age of artificial intelligence 2019Artificial Intelligence for Law Enforcement: Challenges and Opportunities 2022Conformity Assessments and Post-market Monitoring: A Guide to the Role of Auditing in the Proposed European AI Regulation

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.