SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Permutation inference methods for multivariate meta‐analysis
16 references·1 citing·46 second hop
Permutation inference methods for multivariate meta‐analysis (2019)Permutation inference methods for multiva…Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples (2017)Multivariate and network meta…Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (2012)Indirect and mixed‐treatment …Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta‐regression (2012)Consistency and inconsistency…Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: concepts and models for multi‐arm studies (2012)Consistency and inconsistency…Multivariate meta‐analysis: Potential and promise (2011)Multivariate meta‐analysis: P…Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting (2010)Meta-analysis of individual p…Extending DerSimonian and Laird's methodology to perform multivariate random effects meta‐analyses (2009)Extending DerSimonian and Lai…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)A Re-Evaluation of Random-Eff…Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Bivariate analysis of sensiti…Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests (2001)Systematic reviews of evaluat…Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests (2001)Systematic reviews of evaluat…A comparison of statistical methods for meta‐analysis (2001)A comparison of statistical m…Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Discrepancies between Meta-An…BORROWING STRENGTH FROM EXTERNAL TRIALS IN A META-ANALYSIS (1996)BORROWING STRENGTH FROM EXTER…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…Kenward‐Roger–type corrections for inference methods of network meta‐analysis and meta‐regression (2023)Kenward‐Roger–type correction…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial (2010)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis (2013)Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians (2016)Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression (2021)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerations (1993)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis (2001)Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines (2002)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (Chinese edition) (2009)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2023)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data (2015)Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis (2019)Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math (2020)The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods (2015)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Positive Psychological Well-Being and Mortality: A Quantitative Review of Prospective Observational Studies (2008)Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses (2008)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2005Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews3,362 cited
  • 2008A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis2,562 cited
  • 2012Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: concepts and models for multi‐arm studies2,095 cited
  • 2012Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool1,722 cited
  • 2010Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting1,701 cited
  • 2001Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests1,345 cited
  • 1997Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials1,170 cited
  • 2012Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta‐regression1,114 cited
  • 2001Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests851 cited
  • 2009Extending DerSimonian and Laird's methodology to perform multivariate random effects meta‐analyses596 cited
  • 2001A comparison of statistical methods for meta‐analysis571 cited
  • 1996BORROWING STRENGTH FROM EXTERNAL TRIALS IN A META-ANALYSIS

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

560 cited
  • 2011Multivariate meta‐analysis: Potential and promise530 cited
  • 2017Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples247 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Kenward‐Roger–type corrections for inference methods of network meta‐analysis and meta‐regression9 cited