SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What do we mean by ‘systematic’ in health education systematic reviews and why it matters!
4 references·1 citing·26 second hop
What do we mean by ‘systematic’ in health education systematic reviews and why it matters! (2018)What do we mean by ‘systematic’ in health…Understanding scoping reviews (2016)Understanding scoping reviewsHow to Conduct a Systematic Review: A Narrative Literature Review (2016)How to Conduct a Systematic R…RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses (2013)RAMESES publication standards…The need for evidence in education (2000)The need for evidence in educ…Analysing synthesis of evidence in a systematic review in health professions education: observations on struggling beyond Kirkpatrick (2020)Analysing synthesis of eviden…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation (2015)Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning. (1984)Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning (1989)Problem Based Learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework (1995)The missions of medical schools: the pursuit of health in the service of society (2001)Factors Influencing the Successful Introduction of Portfolios (2007)Challenges of synthesizing medical education research (2014)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Body image, physical activity, and sport: A scoping review (2018)The impact of e-cycling on travel behaviour: A scoping review (2020)Green finance gap in green buildings: A scoping review and future research needs (2021)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Brain-to-Brain Neural Synchrony During Social Interactions: A Systematic Review on Hyperscanning Studies (2020)Systematically reviewing servant leadership (2020)Potential Roles of Large Language Models in the Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (2024)Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2003)Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses1,374 cited
  • 2016Understanding scoping reviews740 cited
  • 2016How to Conduct a Systematic Review: A Narrative Literature Review268 cited
  • 2000The need for evidence in education143 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Analysing synthesis of evidence in a systematic review in health professions education: observations on struggling beyond Kirkpatrick12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work