SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Importance of assessing and adjusting for cross-study heterogeneity in network meta-analysis: a case study of psoriasis
10 references·2 citing·36 second hopsampled
Importance of assessing and adjusting for cross-study heterogeneity in network meta-analysis: a case study of psoriasis (2018)Importance of assessing and adjusting for…Network meta-analysis incorporating randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative cohort studies for assessing the safety and effectiveness of medical treatments: challenges and opportunities (2015)Network meta-analysis incorpo…Characteristics of Networks of Interventions: A Description of a Database of 186 Published Networks (2014)Characteristics of Networks o…Assessing key assumptions of network meta‐analysis: a review of methods (2013)Assessing key assumptions of …Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (2012)Indirect and mixed‐treatment …NICE DSU Technical Support Document 2: A Generalised Linear Modelling Framework for Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials (2011)NICE DSU Technical Support Do…A case study of multiple-treatments meta-analysis demonstrates that covariates should be considered (2009)A case study of multiple-trea…Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (2004)Controlling the risk of spuri…Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Combination of direct and ind…How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (2002)How should meta‐regression an…Bayesian random effects meta‐analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales (2002)Bayesian random effects meta‐…Methodological review of NMA bias concepts provides groundwork for the development of a list of concepts for potential inclusion in a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis (RoB NMA Tool) (2024)Methodological review of NMA …Epidemiological, methodological, and statistical characteristics of network meta-analysis in anaesthesia: a systematic review (2022)Epidemiological, methodologic…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp (1988)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Automating network meta‐analysis (2012)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2 (2012)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial (2010)Network meta-analysis: application and practice using Stata (2017)Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: concepts and models for multi‐arm studies (2012)Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages (2014)GetReal in network meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology (2016)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Improved tests for a random effects meta‐regression with a single covariate (2003)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1997)Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (2002)10.1007/978-1-4899-4485-6 (2000)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods (2015)QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1 (1987)Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods (1999)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)Combining randomized and non‐randomized evidence in network meta‐analysis (2017)The use of single armed observational data to closing the gap in otherwise disconnected evidence networks: a network meta-analysis in multiple myeloma (2018)A bibliometric analysis of global research output on network meta-analysis (2021)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2002How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?3,021 cited
  • 2004Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons2,168 cited
  • 2012Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool1,728 cited
  • 2004Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression1,264 cited
  • 2011NICE DSU Technical Support Document 2: A Generalised Linear Modelling Framework for Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials555 cited
  • 2009A case study of multiple-treatments meta-analysis demonstrates that covariates should be considered302 cited
  • 2002Bayesian random effects meta‐analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales279 cited
  • 2013Assessing key assumptions of network meta‐analysis: a review of methods275 cited
  • 2015Network meta-analysis incorporating randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative cohort studies for assessing the safety and effectiveness of medical treatments: challenges and opportunities145 cited
  • 2014Characteristics of Networks of Interventions: A Description of a Database of 186 Published Networks130 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Methodological review of NMA bias concepts provides groundwork for the development of a list of concepts for potential inclusion in a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis (RoB NMA Tool)18 cited
  • 2022Epidemiological, methodological, and statistical characteristics of network meta-analysis in anaesthesia: a systematic review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

17 cited