Institutional amnesia and public policy

Abstract

Institutional amnesia continues to be ignored by policy scholars despite the fact that it can undermine the effectiveness of public policy in various ways. In calling on policy scholars to start taking amnesia seriously as a research concern, this article provides data and analytical tools to help develop that agenda. The data are drawn from an international comparison of policy learning and amnesia in four Westminster systems (Australia, Canada, New Zealand, UK), which highlights how public-sector leaders widely regard amnesia as a serious matter of concern. Analytical tools are presented in the form of a working definition of amnesia that can operationalize research; a series of hypotheses about how amnesia can act as an independent variable in relation to other policy concerns; and a variety of research-based pathways through which policy practitioners might seek to address the risk of memory-loss.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 63 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.