Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Stratification by quality induced selection bias in a meta-analysis of clinical trials

16 references·6 citing·39 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
2011Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials7,681 cited
1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
2011GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)2,798 cited
1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
1981A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial1,349 cited
1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
2018A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis1,155 cited
1992Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis640 cited
2010Small study effects in meta-analyses of osteoarthritis trials: meta-epidemiological study559 cited
1994Invited Commentary: A Critical Look at Some Popular Meta-Analytic Methods508 cited
2002

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials

473 cited

2002Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in ‘meta‐epidemiological’ research380 cited

2001On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions359 cited

Cited by

2019Comparison of bias adjustment methods in meta-analysis suggests that quality effects modeling may have less limitations than other approaches61 cited
2019A unified framework for bias assessment in clinical research41 cited
2021Methodological issues of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field of sleep medicine: A meta-epidemiological study30 cited
2021Bias Assessment in Outcomes Research: The Role of Relative Versus Absolute Approaches30 cited
2025Examining and Interpreting Doi Plot Asymmetry in Meta‐Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials24 cited
2022One-Third of Systematic Reviews in Rehabilitation Applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) System to Evaluate Certainty of Evidence: A Meta-Research Study24 cited