SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Bias Assessment in Outcomes Research: The Role of Relative Versus Absolute Approaches · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleBias Assessment in Outcomes Research: The Role of Relative Versus Absolute Approaches

Jennifer Stone2021

OA

Articlebronze2021

Bias Assessment in Outcomes Research: The Role of Relative Versus Absolute Approaches

Jennifer Stone · Usha Gurunathan · Edoardo Aromataris · Kathryn Glass · Peter Tugwell · Zachary Munn +1 more

30 citations·0/0 files stored·Value in Health

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Epidemiology Delphi Technique in Research

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 30 citations exist upstream.

References

2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials 2016A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?1996Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients.2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials 2008Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis

Cited by

2024Mastering meta‐analysis in Microsoft Excel with MetaXL add‐in: A comprehensive tutorial and guide to meta‐analysis 2024MASTER scale for methodological quality assessment: Reliability assessment and update

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2018Stratification by quality induced selection bias in a meta-analysis of clinical trialsreview · 14 shared references 2019A unified framework for bias assessment in clinical researchreview · 14 shared references 2002Impact of quality scales on levels of evidence inferred from a systematic review of exercise therapy and low back painreview · 11 shared references 2019Comparison of bias adjustment methods in meta-analysis suggests that quality effects modeling may have less limitations than other approachesarticle · 10 shared references 2013Inconsistency in the items included in tools used in general health research and physical therapy to evaluate the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials: a descriptive analysisreview · 10 shared references 2006Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandonedreview · 9 shared references

Details

Year2021

Typearticle

Published2021-05-19

VenueValue in Health

ISSN-L1098-3015

Languageen

Citations30

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.jval.2021.02.011

openalex_workW3161848643

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.