The Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative

Olavo B. Amaral · Kleber Neves · Ana Paula Wasilewska‐Sampaio · Clarissa F. D. Carneiro

49 citations0/0 files storedeLife

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic Publishing and Open Access scientometrics and bibliometrics research Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

Abstract

Most efforts to estimate the reproducibility of published findings have focused on specific areas of research, even though science is usually assessed and funded on a regional or national basis. Here we describe a project to assess the reproducibility of findings in biomedical science published by researchers based in Brazil. The Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative is a systematic, multicenter effort to repeat between 60 and 100 experiments: the project will focus on a set of common methods, repeating each experiment in three different laboratories from a countrywide network. The results, due in 2021, will allow us to estimate the level of reproducibility of biomedical science in Brazil, and to investigate what aspects of the published literature might help to predict whether a finding is reproducible.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 49 citations exist upstream.

References

2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility 2017A manifesto for reproducible science 2011Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?2018Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 2005Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research

Cited by

2021Reproducibility: expect less of the scientific paper 2021What have we learned?2021A community-led initiative for training in reproducible research 2020Addressing selective reporting of experiments through predefined exclusion criteria 2025Estimating the replicability of Brazilian biomedical science 2025A scoping review on metrics to quantify reproducibility: a multitude of questions leads to a multitude of metrics

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.