SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Using the Driving Behavior of an Automated Vehicle to Communicate Intentions - A Wizard of Oz Study
4 references·0 citing·20 second hop
Using the Driving Behavior of an Automated Vehicle to Communicate Intentions - A Wizard of Oz Study (2018)Using the Driving Behavior of an Automate…Taxonomy of Traffic Situations for the Interaction between Automated Vehicles and Human Road Users (2017)Taxonomy of Traffic Situation…Intent Communication between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians (2017)Intent Communication between …Evaluation of Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication Displays for Autonomous Vehicles (2017)Evaluation of Vehicle-to-Pede…Will There Be New Communication Needs When Introducing Automated Vehicles to the Urban Context? (2016)Will There Be New Communicati…A circumplex model of affect. (1980)Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. (1992)Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (1993)Human-Vehicle Interfaces: The Power of Vehicle Movement Gestures in Human Road User Coordination (2017)Pedestrian road-crossing willingness as a function of vehicle automation, external appearance, and driving behaviour (2019)Studying pedestrians’ crossing behavior when interacting with automated vehicles using virtual reality (2019)Störungen und Klärungen : allgemeine psychologie der Kommunikation (1981)Man kann nicht nicht kommunizieren! (2011)Psychologie der Kommunikation (2015)External HMIs and Their Effect on the Interaction Between Pedestrians and Automated Vehicles (2017)A Tool, not a Toy: Using Virtual Reality to Evaluate the Communication Between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians (2019)Understanding the Messages Conveyed by Automated Vehicles (2019)E-commerce trust metrics and models (2000)Relational agents (2001)Improved human-robot team performance using chaski, a human-inspired plan execution system (2011)To Walk or Not to Walk: Crowdsourced Assessment of External Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Displays (2017)After you?! – Use of external human-machine interfaces in road bottleneck scenarios (2020)The Effects of Explicit Intention Communication, Conspicuous Sensors, and Pedestrian Attitude in Interactions with Automated Vehicles (2020)The Case for Implicit External Human-Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicles (2019)Road users rarely use explicit communication when interacting in today’s traffic: implications for automated vehicles (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017Evaluation of Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication Displays for Autonomous Vehicles185 cited
  • 2016Will There Be New Communication Needs When Introducing Automated Vehicles to the Urban Context?159 cited
  • 2017Intent Communication between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians92 cited
  • 2017Taxonomy of Traffic Situations for the Interaction between Automated Vehicles and Human Road Users75 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work