SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
CiteScore metrics: Creating journal metrics from the Scopus citation index
14 references·16 citing·40 second hop
CiteScore metrics: Creating journal metrics from the Scopus citation index (2019)CiteScore metrics: Creating journal metri…The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects (2019)The Journal Impact Factor: A …Applied Evaluative Informetrics (2017)Applied Evaluative Informetri…Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric (2016)Beat it, impact factor! Publi…The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The Metric Tide: Independent …Editors’ JIF-boosting stratagems – Which are appropriate and which not? (2015)Editors’ JIF-boosting stratag…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (2013)The San Francisco Declaration…Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)Impact factor: outdated artef…What lies behind the averages and significance of citation indicators in different disciplines? (2010)What lies behind the averages…SJR and SNIP: two new journal metrics in Elsevier's Scopus (2010)SJR and SNIP: two new journal…The Journal Impact Factor Denominator (2009)The Journal Impact Factor Den…History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences (2009)History of the journal impact…The Impact Factor Game (2006)The Impact Factor GameImpact factors can mislead (1996)Impact factors can misleadEvaluating the speed of citation in scientific journals: A survival analysis-based approach (2025)Evaluating the speed of citat…Five problems plaguing publishing in the life sciences—and one common cause (2024)Five problems plaguing publis…The Emergence of the Open Research University Through International Research Collaboration (2023)The Emergence of the Open Res…Trajectories of Brand Personality Research since the New Millennium: A Bibliometric Analysis (2022)Trajectories of Brand Persona…Mapping the quantity, quality and structural indicators of Asian (48 countries and 3 territories) research productivity on cloud computing (2022)Mapping the quantity, quality…Journal quality criteria: Measurement and significance (2022)Journal quality criteria: Mea…Do papers (really) match journals’ “aims and scope”? A computational assessment of innovation studies (2022)Do papers (really) match jour…Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles: Statistically flawed or not? [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] (2021)Use of the journal impact fac…Indicadores bibliométricos para evaluar la actividad científica (2021)Indicadores bibliométricos pa…Editorial Strategy to Get a Scholarly Journal Indexed by Scopus (2021)Editorial Strategy to Get a S…Bibliometric analysis of sports studies in the "Journal Sport Area" (2021)Bibliometric analysis of spor…Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles: Statistically flawed or not? (2020)Use of the journal impact fac…Sources without a CiteScore value: more clarity is required (2020)Sources without a CiteScore v…Interorganizational learning: a bibliometric review and research agenda (2020)Interorganizational learning:…Correlation between the CiteScore and Journal Impact Factor of top-ranked library and information science journals (2020)Correlation between the CiteS…CiteScore: Advances, Evolution, Applications, and Limitations (2020)CiteScore: Advances, Evolutio…Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2005)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)Descriptions of Sampling Practices Within Five Approaches to Qualitative Research in Education and the Health Sciences (2014)The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power (2014)Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers (2019)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Improving the accuracy of institute for scientific information's journal impact factors (1995)The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators (2009)University–industry collaboration in Italy: A bibliometric examination (2009)Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)Human behavior and the principle of least effort (1949)The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age (2012)The Use of Bibliometrics for Assessing Research: Possibilities, Limitations and Adverse Effects (2014)Publish or impoverish (2017)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification (1972)Econometric policy evaluation: A critique (1976)Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing (2019)The Bibliometric Literature on Scopus and WoS: The Medicine and Environmental Sciences Categories as Case of Study (2021)Reproducibility in machine‐learning‐based research: Overview, barriers, and drivers (2025)The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus (2016)Could scientists use Altmetric.com scores to predict longer term citation counts? (2018)Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities (2021)CiteScore: A cite for sore eyes, or a valuable, transparent metric? (2017)Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study (2017)How the Geographic Diversity of Editorial Boards Affects What Is Published in JCR-Ranked Communication Journals (2020)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)Exploratory Research (2020)Core elements in the process of citing publications: Conceptual overview of the literature (2018)Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science (2018)Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK research excellence framework (REF) (2019)The Altmetrics Collection (2012)Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2015The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management610 cited
  • 2006The Impact Factor Game372 cited
  • 2011Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?370 cited
  • 2009History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences326 cited
  • 2019The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects249 cited
  • 1996Impact factors can mislead227 cited
  • 2016Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric220 cited
  • 2013The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment171 cited
  • 2017Applied Evaluative Informetrics153 cited
  • 2009The Journal Impact Factor Denominator129 cited
  • 2015Editors’ JIF-boosting stratagems – Which are appropriate and which not?128 cited
  • 2010SJR and SNIP: two new journal metrics in Elsevier's Scopus98 cited
  • 2010What lies behind the averages and significance of citation indicators in different disciplines?75 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Interorganizational learning: a bibliometric review and research agenda

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

101 cited
  • 2021Indicadores bibliométricos para evaluar la actividad científica62 cited
  • 2020CiteScore: Advances, Evolution, Applications, and Limitations58 cited
  • 2020Correlation between the CiteScore and Journal Impact Factor of top-ranked library and information science journals50 cited
  • 2021Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles: Statistically flawed or not? [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]49 cited
  • 2020Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles: Statistically flawed or not?39 cited
  • 2022Journal quality criteria: Measurement and significance28 cited
  • 2021Editorial Strategy to Get a Scholarly Journal Indexed by Scopus26 cited
  • 2022Mapping the quantity, quality and structural indicators of Asian (48 countries and 3 territories) research productivity on cloud computing20 cited
  • 2024Five problems plaguing publishing in the life sciences—and one common cause18 cited
  • 2021Bibliometric analysis of sports studies in the "Journal Sport Area"13 cited
  • 2022Trajectories of Brand Personality Research since the New Millennium: A Bibliometric Analysis11 cited
  • 2023The Emergence of the Open Research University Through International Research Collaboration10 cited
  • 2020Sources without a CiteScore value: more clarity is required9 cited
  • 2025Evaluating the speed of citation in scientific journals: A survival analysis-based approach8 cited
  • 2022Do papers (really) match journals’ “aims and scope”? A computational assessment of innovation studies8 cited