SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Attorney jury selection folklore: What do they think and how can psychologists help?
0 references·16 citing·56 second hop
Attorney jury selection folklore: What do they think and how can psychologists help? (1990)Attorney jury selection folklore: What do…The relationship between mock jurors’ religious characteristics and their verdicts and sentencing decisions. (2014)The relationship between mock…God in the Courtroom (2009)God in the CourtroomThe Effects of Victim’s Substance Use and Relationship Closeness on Mock Jurors’ Judgments in an Acquaintance Rape Case (2006)The Effects of Victim’s Subst…The impact of different types of expert scientific testimony on mock jurors’ liability verdicts (2004)The impact of different types…Voir Dire and Jury Selection (2003)Voir Dire and Jury SelectionSexual harassment stories: Testing a story-mediated model of juror decision-making in civil litigation. (2003)Sexual harassment stories: Te…Does personality influence reactions to judicial instructions? Some preliminary findings and possible implications. (2000)Does personality influence re…Whither trial consulting? Issues and projections. (1999)Whither trial consulting? Iss…The peremptory challenge accused of race or gender discrimination? Some data from one county. (1999)The peremptory challenge accu…Some individual differences in perception of the evidence and the verdict choice (1998)Some individual differences i…Revising the factor structure of the Juror Bias Scale: A method for the empirical validation of theoretical constructs. (1998)Revising the factor structure…Extra‐legal factors and product liability: The influence of mock jurors' demographic characteristics and intuitions about the cause of an injury (1994)Extra‐legal factors and produ…Effectiveness of voir dire as a safeguard in eyewitness cases. (1994)Effectiveness of voir dire as…David, Goliath, and reverend Bayes: Prior beliefs about defendants' status in personal injury cases (1994)David, Goliath, and reverend …Exploring the First and Sixth Amendments: Pretrial Publicity and Jury Decision Making (1992)Exploring the First and Sixth…Barring ultimate issue testimony: An "insane" rule? (1991)Barring ultimate issue testim…On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. (1962)Personality and Assessment (1968)Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975)Bias in jury selection: justifying prohibited peremptory challenges (2007)Determinants and Consequences of Jury Racial Diversity: Empirical Findings, Implications, and Directions for Future Research (2008)Predicting guilt judgments and verdict change using a measure of pretrial bias in a videotaped mock trial with deliberating jurors (2009)Behavioral sciences and the law. (1966)Evaluating Competencies (1986)Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments (1988)"Empirical research on the insanity defense and attempted reforms: Evidence toward informed policy": Erratum. (1999)Opinion formation in evaluating the adjudicative competence and restorability of criminal defendants: a review of 8,000 evaluations (2006)Child abuse in the eyes of the beholder: Lay perceptions of child sexual and physical abuse (2007)Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. (1977)Direct Experience And Attitude-Behavior Consistency (1981)Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. (1988)The effects of mock jurors' beliefs about eyewitness performance on trial judgments (2011)Beyond Frequency: Perceived Realism and the CSI Effect (2014)The Effect of Peremptory Challenges on Jury and Verdict: An Experiment in a Federal District Court (1978)On the Effectiveness of Voir Dire in Criminal Cases with Prejudicial Pretrial Publicity: An Empirical Study (1991)REAL JURIES (2005)The impact of prejudice screening procedures on racial bias in the courtroom. (2008)Racial Disparities in the Criminal Justice System: Prevalence, Causes, and a Search for Solutions (2019)Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. (1966)Comparative fit indexes in structural models. (1990)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Examining the construct validity of the original and revised JBS: A cross-validation of sample and method. (2002)Validity beliefs and ideology can influence legal case judgments differently. (2002)Identifying and measuring juror pre-trial bias for forensic evidence: development and validation of the Forensic Evidence Evaluation Bias Scale (2011)Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. (1988)Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. (1992)Juror Decision‐Making (2007)Measuring Narrative Believability: Development and Validation of the Narrative Believability Scale (NBS-12) (2013)Can jurors be biased in their evaluation of third-party evidence within cases of rape? (2022)On the psychology of prediction. (1973)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (2003)Juror Need for Cognition and Sensitivity to Methodological Flaws in Expert Evidence1 (2008)The Research-Practice Gap in I/O Psychology and Related Fields: Challenges and Potential Solutions (2012)Cultural myths and supports for rape. (1980)Rape Myths (1994)The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. (1996)The Role of Alcohol and Victim Sexual Interest in Spanish Students’ Perceptions of Sexual Assault (2011)Alcohol-Related Victim Behavior and Rape Myth Acceptance as Predictors of Victim Blame in Sexual Assault Cases (2017)Increasing awareness of the severity of female victimization by opportunistic drug-facilitated sexual assault: A new viewpoint (2020)Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment (1971)Conservatism in human information processing (1982)Causation in the Law (1985)Legal blame: how jurors think and talk about accidents (2000)Juror sensitivity to the cross-race effect. (2003)Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)Judgment under Uncertainty (1982)The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (1988)Religious Fundamentalism and Psychological Well-Being: An Italian Study (2015)Capital-izing Jurors: How Death Qualification Relates to Jury Composition, Jurors’ Perceptions, and Trial Outcomes (2016)Religious fundamentalism, religiosity, and priming: effects on attitudes, perceptions, and mock jurors’ decisions in an insanity defense case (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2006The Effects of Victim’s Substance Use and Relationship Closeness on Mock Jurors’ Judgments in an Acquaintance Rape Case67 cited
  • 2004The impact of different types of expert scientific testimony on mock jurors’ liability verdicts62 cited
  • 1994Extra‐legal factors and product liability: The influence of mock jurors' demographic characteristics and intuitions about the cause of an injury62 cited
  • 1999The peremptory challenge accused of race or gender discrimination? Some data from one county.51 cited
  • 1998Revising the factor structure of the Juror Bias Scale: A method for the empirical validation of theoretical constructs.42 cited
  • 1994Effectiveness of voir dire as a safeguard in eyewitness cases.41 cited
  • 2003Sexual harassment stories: Testing a story-mediated model of juror decision-making in civil litigation.39 cited
  • 1991Barring ultimate issue testimony: An "insane" rule?35 cited
  • 2009God in the Courtroom28 cited
  • 2003Voir Dire and Jury Selection28 cited
  • 1999Whither trial consulting? Issues and projections.25 cited
  • 2014The relationship between mock jurors’ religious characteristics and their verdicts and sentencing decisions.24 cited
  • 1994David, Goliath, and reverend Bayes: Prior beliefs about defendants' status in personal injury cases24 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 1992Exploring the First and Sixth Amendments: Pretrial Publicity and Jury Decision Making19 cited
  • 2000Does personality influence reactions to judicial instructions? Some preliminary findings and possible implications.18 cited
  • 1998Some individual differences in perception of the evidence and the verdict choice15 cited