Articlebronze2018

Turning the Page: A New Year and a New Leaf

4 citations0/0 files storedPublic Administration Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Public Policy and Administration Research Public Administration and Governance Public Administration and Political Analysis

Abstract

Administration Review (PAR) enters its 79th year of publication, the world is changing at a feverish pace.We would like to take a few moments to share our perspective on recent trends in public administration research, including what we expect to see submitted during the coming year, as well as what-without some gentle prodding-we do not expect to see.PAR has several exciting projects underway in the form of symposia that highlight major topics in need of further study and discourse.From corruption to public entrepreneurship, and comparative public administration, you can be on the lookout for a variety of targeted topics in the issues that will appear throughout this volume and beyond. Looking Back to Look AheadReflecting on our experience over the past year as we took up the helm of PAR, we have made a number of observations about the state of the discipline.A number of topics have risen to the forefront of public discourse, and scholarship has followed in lock-step.We have seen a large number of manuscripts focused on social equity and public sector values.In fact, this issue is the second we have produced in the past 6 months with focus on that topic.Looking back to issue 78(3), we saw five strong pieces that examined inequitable public participation (Clark 2018), disparities between men and women in academia (Rabovsky and Lee 2018), pay equity (Lewis, Boyd, and Pathak 2018), performance improvement through gender matching (Guul 2018), and the role of gender differences in managerial networking (Rho and Lee 2018).Looking back to previous years, we see a steady trend of research concerned with social equity in various settings and from various perspectives.Gooden (2017) reveals how evidence-based decision making informs social equity from a local government perspective.Valenzuela (2017) explores one county's efforts to institutionalize equity and social justice.Siddiki, Kim, and Leach (2017) look at diversity and trust in the context of collaborative governance.And, of course, the symposium on race and policing

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 4 citations exist upstream.

References

2017Diversity, Trust, and Social Learning in Collaborative Governance 2018Prospect Theory Goes Public: Experimental Evidence on Cognitive Biases in Public Policy and Management Decisions 2018Only When We Agree!How Value Congruence Moderates the Impact of Goal‐Oriented Leadership on Public Service Motivation 2018Do White Law Enforcement Officers Target Minority Suspects?2017Designing Public Participation: Managing Problem Settings and Social Equity 2018Financial Rewards Do Not Stimulate Coproduction: Evidence from Two Experiments 2018Social Media and Value Conflicts: An Explorative Study of the Dutch Police 2018Framing Effects under Different Uses of Performance Information: An Experimental Study on Public Managers

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.