SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Influence of Familiarity Recency and Eyewitness Age on Mock Jurors’ Judgement
16 references·0 citing·54 second hop
The Influence of Familiarity Recency and Eyewitness Age on Mock Jurors’ Judgement (2019)The Influence of Familiarity Recency and …Eyewitness identification across the life span: A meta-analysis of age differences. (2015)Eyewitness identification acr…Influence of eyewitness age and recall error on mock juror decision‐making (2012)Influence of eyewitness age a…What are we studying? Student jurors, community jurors, and construct validity (2011)What are we studying? Student…Mock Jury Research: Where Do We Go from Here? (2011)Mock Jury Research: Where Do …Jury decision making research: Are researchers focusing on the mouse and not the elephant in the room? (2011)Jury decision making research…Eyewitness Identification (2011)Eyewitness IdentificationA field evaluation of the VIPER system: a new technique for eliciting eyewitness identification evidence (2011)A field evaluation of the VIP…Does Trial presentation medium matter in jury simulation research? Evaluating the effectiveness of eyewitness expert testimony (2009)Does Trial presentation mediu…Is There a Double Standard of Aging?: Older Men and Women and Ageism (2008)Is There a Double Standard of…The perceived credibility of older adults as witnesses and its relation to ageism (2007)The perceived credibility of …Characteristics of eyewitness identification that predict the outcome of real lineups (2003)Characteristics of eyewitness…Head Over the Heart or Heart Over the Head? Cognitive Experiential Self‐Theory and Extralegal Heuristics in Juror Decision Making1 (2002)Head Over the Heart or Heart …The child in the eyes of the jury: Assessing mock jurors' perceptions of the child witness. (1990)The child in the eyes of the …When a child takes the stand: Jurors' perceptions of children's eyewitness testimony. (1987)When a child takes the stand:…The Child in the Eyes of the Jury: Assessing Mock Jurors’ Perceptions of the Child Witness (1987)The Child in the Eyes of the …Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. (1986)Evidence evaluation in comple…Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations. (1997)The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? (1999)Racial Bias in Mock Juror Decision-Making: A Meta-Analytic Review of Defendant Treatment. (2005)Explaining Gender Differences in Jurors' Reactions to Child Sexual Assault Cases (2014)A meta-analysis of the emotional victim effect for female adult rape complainants: Does complainant distress influence credibility? (2019)What do we know about rape myths and juror decision making? (2020)The psychology of sex differences (1975)Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences (1984)The effect of evidence factors and victim characteristics on prosecutors' charging decisions in sexual assault cases (1997)The nature of children’s true and false narratives (2002)The investigative interviewing of children and other vulnerable witnesses: Psychological research and working/professional practice (2009)Communication And Persuasion (2017)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)New directions in discourse processing . Edited by Roy O. Freedle. (Advances in discourse processes, 2.) Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1979. Pp. xv, 336. $23.95. (1980)Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. (1983)Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. (1992)Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. (1994)IMAGINE YOURSELF IN THE PRODUCT : Mental Simulation, Narrative Transportation, and Persuasion (2004)Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (1964)Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Can experts help jurors to evaluate eyewitness evidence? A review of eyewitness expert effects (2009)I spy with my little eye: Jurors’ detection of internal validity threats in expert evidence. (2010)The (minimal) persuasive advantage of political video over text (2021)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Dual-process theories in social psychology (1999)The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases (2004)Assessing individual differences in adolescents’ preference for rational and experiential cognition (2007)Scientific jury selection. (2007)Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender. (1981)Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. (1998)Predictors of eyewitness identification decisions from video lineups in England: A field study. (2011)An evaluation of lineup presentation, weapon presence, and a distinctive feature using ROC analysis. (2014)Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: An experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure. (2014)Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators (1981)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)He Says, She Says: Mothers and Children Remembering the Same Events (2017)Imprisoned But Innocent: Wrongful Convictions and Imprisonments in Germany, 1990-2016 (2019)Fiabilidad de la prueba testimonial: breve análisis desde la psicología del testimonio y los errores de la memoria (2021)The American Jury (1971)The Battered Woman (1979)Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family. (1982)Reactions to child (versus adult) eyewitnesses: The influence of jurors' preconceptions and witness behavior. (1989)The effects of complainant age and expert psychological testimony in a simulated child sexual abuse trial. (1993)Empathy and jurors' decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations. (2000)The defendant's dilemma: Effects of jurors' attitudes and authoritarianism on judicial decisions. (1973)A critical review of the jury simulation paradigm: The case of defendant characteristics. (1979)Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis. (1997)Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. (1985)Psychology and law: an empirical perspective (2006)Instruction bias and lineup presentation moderate the effects of administrator knowledge on eyewitness identification. (2008)Are the misinformed more punitive? Beliefs and misconceptions in forensic psychology (2013)The Role of Familiarity with the Defendant, Type of Descriptor Discrepancy, and Eyewitness Age on Mock Jurors’ Perceptions of Eyewitness Testimony (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Evidence evaluation in complex decision making.659 cited
  • 2003Characteristics of eyewitness identification that predict the outcome of real lineups152 cited
  • 1987When a child takes the stand: Jurors' perceptions of children's eyewitness testimony.142 cited
  • 2011Mock Jury Research: Where Do We Go from Here?141 cited
  • 1990The child in the eyes of the jury: Assessing mock jurors' perceptions of the child witness.123 cited
  • 1987The Child in the Eyes of the Jury: Assessing Mock Jurors’ Perceptions of the Child Witness119 cited
  • 2015Eyewitness identification across the life span: A meta-analysis of age differences.111 cited
  • 2011Eyewitness Identification105 cited
  • 2009Does Trial presentation medium matter in jury simulation research? Evaluating the effectiveness of eyewitness expert testimony73 cited
  • 2002Head Over the Heart or Heart Over the Head? Cognitive Experiential Self‐Theory and Extralegal Heuristics in Juror Decision Making171 cited
  • 2011Jury decision making research: Are researchers focusing on the mouse and not the elephant in the room?69 cited
  • 2011A field evaluation of the VIPER system: a new technique for eliciting eyewitness identification evidence64 cited
  • 2007The perceived credibility of older adults as witnesses and its relation to ageism56 cited
  • 2011What are we studying? Student jurors, community jurors, and construct validity

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

52 cited
  • 2012Influence of eyewitness age and recall error on mock juror decision‐making49 cited
  • 2008Is There a Double Standard of Aging?: Older Men and Women and Ageism43 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.