Review2019

Self-discrepancy theory as a transdiagnostic framework: A meta-analysis of self-discrepancy and psychopathology.

Tyler B. Mason · Kathryn E. Smith · Allison Engwall · Alisson N. S. Lass · Michael P. Mead · Morgan Sorby +3 more

149 citations0/0 files storedPsychological Bulletin

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes Personality Disorders and Psychopathology Psychological Treatments and Assessments

Abstract

Self-discrepancy theory (SDT) is a model of the relations between the self and affect which has been applied to the study of different types of psychopathology including depression, anxiety, and eating disorders. Although the theory itself is compatible with a transdiagnostic perspective on psychopathology, to date no systematic review of the literature has examined that possibility. We conducted a meta-analysis that synthesized the literature on self-discrepancy and psychopathology across a heterogeneous range of 70 studies. Results showed a small-to-medium association between self-discrepancy and psychopathology that was highly robust and similar in magnitude across domains. Furthermore, self-discrepancy was related to higher levels of a range of negative emotions and lower levels of a range of positive emotions. Meta-regression models showed that the effects were greater for actual:ideal discrepancy compared with actual:ought discrepancy for both depression and anxiety, which was contrary to the tenets of SDT which suggests specific associations between actual:ideal discrepancy and depression and actual:ought discrepancy and anxiety. Measurement type (i.e., idiographic vs. nomothetic) was a significant predictor of the effects for depression and anxiety, such that nomothetic measures evidenced greater associations compared with idiographic measures. Our findings could suggest that self-discrepancy represents a contributory factor related to a number of psychiatric disorders. However, the tenet of SDT suggesting unique associations between actual:ideal and actual:ought discrepancy and anxiety and depression respectively was not supported. Implications are discussed for future research on self-discrepancy and psychopathology including the study of mechanistic frameworks. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 149 citations exist upstream.

References

1992A power primer.1969Attachment and Loss 2021Introduction to Meta‐Analysis 1987Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.2009Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review 2006Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index?1998Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as A Motivational Principle 2012Does low self-esteem predict depression and anxiety? A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

Cited by

2020From zero to hero: An exploratory study examining sudden hero status among nonphysician health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.2020Comparing integrative cognitive‐affective therapy and guided self‐help cognitive‐behavioral therapy to treat binge‐eating disorder using standard and naturalistic momentary outcome measures: A randomized controlled trial 2021Educational Aspirations and Expectations of Adolescents in Rural China: Determinants, Mental Health, and Academic Outcomes 2022Self-discrepancy, Depression, Anxiety, and Psychological Well-Being: The Role of Affective Style and Self-efficacy

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.