this work references cited by second hopReferences
- 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
- 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
- 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
- 2014The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses17,633 cited
- 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
- 2009Introduction to Meta‐Analysis14,215 cited
- 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,163 cited
- 1998The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.8,247 cited
- 1976Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research4,889 cited
- 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
- 2019The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis4,525 cited
- 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
- 2003Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies2,905 cited
- 2004Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement
Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work