SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Trial2rev: Combining machine learning and crowd-sourcing to create a shared space for updating systematic reviews
16 references·3 citing·49 second hop
Trial2rev: Combining machine learning and crowd-sourcing to create a shared space for updating systematic reviews (2019)Trial2rev: Combining machine learning and…Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)Living systematic review: 1. …When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist (2016)When and how to update system…Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Using text mining for study i…Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Erratum to: Using text mining…Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Systematic review automation …Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap (2014)Living Systematic Reviews: An…Extent of Non-Publication in Cohorts of Studies Approved by Research Ethics Committees or Included in Trial Registries (2014)Extent of Non-Publication in …Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Systematic Review of the Empi…Applications of text mining within systematic reviews (2011)Applications of text mining w…The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)The impact of outcome reporti…Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleve…Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews (2010)Semi-automated screening of b…Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Dissemination and publication…Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification (2005)Reducing Workload in Systemat…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Registering Clinical Trials (2003)Registering Clinical TrialsIs it time for computable evidence synthesis? (2020)Is it time for computable evi…How to decide whether a systematic review is stable and not in need of updating: Analysis of Cochrane reviews (2020)How to decide whether a syste…The risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates can be estimated by learning from a database of published examples (2019)The risk of conclusion change…Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa (1959)Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. (1986)Publication bias and clinical trials (1987)Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review (2010)Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template (2016)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2018)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias (2014)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application (2019)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology (2016)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort (2017)Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting (2018)Comparison of mental health symptoms before and during the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 134 cohorts (2023)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2013)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review (2019)Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks (2019)Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims (2020)Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
  • 2010The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews1,133 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,126 cited
  • 2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited
  • 2015Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches680 cited
  • 2017Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how652 cited
  • 2014Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap595 cited
  • 2003Registering Clinical Trials511 cited
  • 2014Systematic review automation technologies471 cited
  • 2016When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist424 cited
  • 2005Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification410 cited
  • 2015Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches353 cited
  • 2010Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

351 cited
  • 2014Extent of Non-Publication in Cohorts of Studies Approved by Research Ethics Committees or Included in Trial Registries269 cited
  • 2011Applications of text mining within systematic reviews212 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020How to decide whether a systematic review is stable and not in need of updating: Analysis of Cochrane reviews18 cited
    • 2020Is it time for computable evidence synthesis?16 cited
    • 2019The risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates can be estimated by learning from a database of published examples15 cited