SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Half a century of Anales de Pediatría. Evolution of its main bibliometric indicators in the Web of Science and Scopus international databases
9 references·2 citing·53 second hop
Half a century of Anales de Pediatría. Evolution of its main bibliometric indicators in the Web of Science and Scopus international databases (2019)Half a century of Anales de Pediatría. Ev…Citation classics in pediatrics: a bibliometric analysis (2018)Citation classics in pediatri…The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus (2016)The museum of errors/horrors …Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science (2016)Empirical analysis and classi…A response to “The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus” by Franceschini et al. (2016)A response to “The museum of …A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus (2015)A systematic analysis of dupl…The 100 Classic Papers of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery (2013)The 100 Classic Papers of Ped…Análisis de la productividad e impacto científico de la pediatría española (2006-2010) (2013)Análisis de la productividad …Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (2006)Three options for citation tr…ANALES ESPAÑOLES DE PEDIATRÍA 2001: evolución de los indicadores bibliométricos de calidad científica (2002)ANALES ESPAÑOLES DE PEDIATRÍA…Comparison of self-citation patterns in WoS and Scopus databases based on national scientific production in Slovenia (1996–2020) (2021)Comparison of self-citation p…Trends in scientific research in Insights into Imaging: a bibliometric review (2019)Trends in scientific research…Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university (2009)Indicadores bibliorriétricos utilizados en la evaluación de la ciencia y la tecnología. Revisión bibliográfica (1990)[Bibliometric indicators and the evaluation of medical scientific activity. (III). The indicators of information production, circulation and dispersion, consumption and the repercussions]. (1992)Evaluación de la evidencia científica (1995)Factor de impacto nacional e internacional de ANALES DE PEDIATRÍA (2004)Análisis bibliométrico de la revista Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutrición (2007)Estudio bibliométrico general de colaboración y consumo de la información en artículos originales de la revista Universitas Médica, período 2002 a 2006 (2007)Distribution of Lengths of the Normal Femur and Tibia in Children from One to Eighteen Years of Age (1964)One Hundred Citation Classics in General Surgical Journals (2002)The 100 most-cited articles in spinal oncology (2016)The 100 most influential manuscripts in robotic surgery: a bibliometric analysis (2019)Citation analysis of the 100 top-cited articles on the topic of hidradenitis suppurativa since 2013 using Sankey diagrams: Bibliometric analysis (2022)Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance (2002)The Impact Factor in non-English-speaking countries (2012)Coautoría y redes de colaboración científica de la pediatría española (2006-2010) (2013)Mapa de centros de investigación clínica dermatológica española: resultados del estudio MaIND (2017)En los 50 años de Anales de Pediatría, publicación oficial de la Asociación Española de Pediatría (2018)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus (2009)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)A new methodology for comparing Google Scholar and Scopus (2016)An open database of productivity in Vietnam's social sciences and humanities for public use (2018)Past, current, and future perspectives on eco-tourism: a bibliometric review between 2001 and 2018 (2020)The impact-factors debate: the ISI's uses and limits (2002)San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (2013)The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study (2013)The mismeasure of science: Citation analysis (2017)General discussion of data quality challenges in social media metrics: Extensive comparison of four major altmetric data aggregators (2018)Regional resilience: a stretched concept? (2018)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The data source of this study is Web of Science Core Collection? Not enough (2019)Supply chain resilience: A review, conceptual framework and future research (2021)Search where you will find most: Comparing the disciplinary coverage of 56 bibliographic databases (2022)Social Theory and Social Structure (1958)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Social Theory and Social Structure. (1969)Social media-based sleeping beauties: Defining, identifying and features (2020)The Top 50 Most‐Cited Knee Arthroscopy Studies (2021)Assessing the impact of Canadian primary care research and researchers (2024)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Bibliometric Indicators: Quality Measurements of Scientific Publication (2010)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Análisis bibliométrico de la revista Radiología en el periodo 2010-2019 (2021)Economic viability of building energy efficiency measures: a review on the discount rate (2021)Identification of national research output using Scopus/Web of Science Core Collection: a revisit and further investigation (2023)Red alert: Millions of “homeless” publications in Scopus should be resettled (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science751 cited
  • 2016Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science223 cited
  • 2015A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus154 cited
  • 2016The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus119 cited
  • 2013The 100 Classic Papers of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery70 cited
  • 2018Citation classics in pediatrics: a bibliometric analysis27 cited
  • 2013Análisis de la productividad e impacto científico de la pediatría española (2006-2010)24 cited
  • 2002ANALES ESPAÑOLES DE PEDIATRÍA 2001: evolución de los indicadores bibliométricos de calidad científica24 cited
  • 2016A response to “The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus” by Franceschini et al.16 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Trends in scientific research in Insights into Imaging: a bibliometric review15 cited
  • 2021Comparison of self-citation patterns in WoS and Scopus databases based on national scientific production in Slovenia (1996–2020)13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work