Urban Sustainability and Livability: An Analysis of Doha’s Urban-form and Possible Mitigation Strategies

Soud Khalifa Al-Thani · Muammer Koç‬ · Sami G. Al‐Ghamdi

53 citations0/0 files storedSustainability

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Urban Transport and Accessibility Transportation Planning and Optimization Sustainable Urban and Rural Development

Abstract

This study examines the concept of sustainability and livability at the neighborhood level in a low-density city such as Doha. In its current form, Metropolitan Doha, Qatar’s capital and where 80% of the population resides, is neither sustainable nor ranked highly in many city livability indices of international cities, although Qatar aims to become a truly sustainable state as envisioned in its Qatar National Vision (QNV) 2030 and endorsed in its National Development Strategies 2012 and 2018. Doha remains a fractured city; its rapid growth has led to unrestrained, extensive urban sprawl with high dependency on private transportation mainly by large SUVs, continually instigated by the absence of public transportation. Doha is also a relatively low-density city where the main driver of its urban sprawl is the inhabitants’ deep-set desire for privacy, and hence, home ownership of single-family detached villas, which have become the predominant residential building-block of neighborhoods with little to no provisions of in-neighborhood community services and amenities such as basic shopping, health, education, and recreation. Consequently, this urban form has resulted in long and frequent commutes for individuals and families, increasing the number of vehicles in traffic almost every hour of every day, traffic congestion, high transportation-related CO2 emissions, additional expenses, and loss of quality family time, among several other environmental, social, and economic sustainability impacts. The findings of this study, which are based on a behavioral survey, illustrate the residents’ views on neighborhood improvement and changes in the transportation modes, as well as their willingness to change their habits for the benefit of common and future generations.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 53 citations exist upstream.

References

1996Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities?: Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable Development 2012Planning the resilient city: Concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk 2008Urban Form and Social Sustainability: The Role of Density and Housing Type 2004Land Use Planning Challenges: Coping with Conflicts in Visions of Sustainable Development and Livable Communities 2011The Comparative Archaeology of Complex Societies 2014Rapid urban development and national master planning in Arab Gulf countries. Qatar as a case study 2003Smart Growth: A Prescription for Livable Cities 2015Reconciling Livability and Sustainability

Cited by

2019Sustainable Innovative Project Management: Response to Improve Livability and Quality of Life: Case Studies: Iran and Germany 2020Livability Assessment of Urban Communities considering the Preferences of Different Age Groups 2022A conceptual framework for the assessment of and the transition to liveable, sustainable and equitable cities 2021From Livable Communities to Livable Metropolis: Challenges for Urban Mobility in Lisbon Metropolitan Area (Portugal)

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.