SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Possibility of Systematic Research Fraud Targeting Under-Studied Human Genes: Causes, Consequences, and Potential Solutions
16 references·6 citing·46 second hop
The Possibility of Systematic Research Fraud Targeting Under-Studied Human Genes: Causes, Consequences, and Potential Solutions (2019)The Possibility of Systematic Research Fr…Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors (2016)Reproducibility: A tragedy of…Personality Traits Are Associated with Research Misbehavior in Dutch Scientists: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Personality Traits Are Associ…Perish or Publish in China: Pressures on Young Chinese Scholars to Publish in Internationally Indexed Journals (2016)Perish or Publish in China: P…The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) (2015)The prevalence of statistical…Choosing experiments to accelerate collective discovery (2015)Choosing experiments to accel…Publishing: The peer-review scam (2014)Publishing: The peer-review s…Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Why Has the Number of Scienti…China's Publication Bazaar (2013)China's Publication BazaarScientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science (2012)Scientific Misconduct and the…Perspective (2012)PerspectiveIntended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: A worldwide survey (2012)Intended and unintended conse…Duplicate and fake publications in the scientific literature: how many SCIgen papers in computer science? (2012)Duplicate and fake publicatio…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? (2008)What errors do peer reviewers…Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth (2005)Suspected research fraud: dif…Linking groupthink to unethical behavior in organizations (1992)Linking groupthink to unethic…Machine learning based screening of potential paper mill publications in cancer research: methodological and cross sectional study (2026)Machine learning based screen…Verification of nucleotide sequence reagent identities in original publications in high impact factor cancer research journals (2024)Verification of nucleotide se…How to fight fake papers: a review on important information sources and steps towards solution of the problem (2024)How to fight fake papers: a r…Distortion of journal impact factors in the era of paper mills (2023)Distortion of journal impact …Issues and Challenges to Reproducibility of Cancer Research: A Commentary (2022)Issues and Challenges to Repr…The relationship and incidence of three editorial notices in PubPeer : Errata, expressions of concern, and retractions (2020)The relationship and incidenc…The earth is round (p < .05). (1994)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. (2013)Sample Size, Statistical Power, and False Conclusions in Infant Looking‐Time Research (2017)What You See Is What You Get? Enhancing Methodological Transparency in Management Research (2017)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)On the Folly of Rewarding A, While Hoping for B. (1975)Toward a new economics of science (1994)Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity (2015)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)Exploratory Research (2020)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria (2002)Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel (2011)Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability (2016)Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (1988)Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning (1991)Quantifying patterns of research-interest evolution (2017)Early-career setback and future career impact (2019)Increasing trend of scientists to switch between topics (2019)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Psychology of intergroup relations (1986)Chronicle of Higher Education (1998)An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict (2000)Expectations for Replications (2014)The Chrysalis Effect (2014)What is wrong with evidence based policy, and how can it be improved? (2017)Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days (2018)The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects (2019)Peer-Review Fraud — Hacking the Scientific Publication Process (2015)The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics (2016)Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research (2017)Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows (2017)COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time (2019)AiiDA 1.0, a scalable computational infrastructure for automated reproducible workflows and data provenance (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2015The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013)510 cited
  • 2013Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?415 cited
  • 2012Intended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: A worldwide survey355 cited
  • 2012Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science323 cited
  • 2013China's Publication Bazaar256 cited
  • 2016Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors255 cited
  • 2015Choosing experiments to accelerate collective discovery250 cited
  • 2014Publishing: The peer-review scam228 cited
  • 2008What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?226 cited
  • 1992Linking groupthink to unethical behavior in organizations141 cited
  • 2012Duplicate and fake publications in the scientific literature: how many SCIgen papers in computer science?132 cited
  • 2016Perish or Publish in China: Pressures on Young Chinese Scholars to Publish in Internationally Indexed Journals129 cited
  • 2005Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth125 cited
  • 2016Personality Traits Are Associated with Research Misbehavior in Dutch Scientists: A Cross-Sectional Study

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

114 cited
  • 2012Perspective102 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2026Machine learning based screening of potential paper mill publications in cancer research: methodological and cross sectional study26 cited
    • 2024How to fight fake papers: a review on important information sources and steps towards solution of the problem25 cited
    • 2020The relationship and incidence of three editorial notices in PubPeer : Errata, expressions of concern, and retractions19 cited
    • 2023Distortion of journal impact factors in the era of paper mills16 cited
    • 2024Verification of nucleotide sequence reagent identities in original publications in high impact factor cancer research journals14 cited
    • 2022Issues and Challenges to Reproducibility of Cancer Research: A Commentary8 cited