SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Should this systematic review and meta-analysis change my practice? Part 1: exploring treatment effect and trustworthiness
13 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Should this systematic review and meta-analysis change my practice? Part 1: exploring treatment effect and trustworthiness (2019)Should this systematic review and meta-an…Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Meta-analysis and the science…Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes (2018)Are systematic reviews and me…Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? We are not sure (2018)Are systematic reviews and me…Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No (2018)Are systematic reviews and me…Next-generation systematic reviews: prospective meta-analysis, individual-level data, networks and umbrella reviews (2017)Next-generation systematic re…BJSM educational editorials: methods matter (2017)BJSM educational editorials: …Trusting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: all that glitters is not gold! (2016)Trusting systematic reviews a…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Systematic review hacks for the sports and exercise clinician: five essential methodological elements (2015)Systematic review hacks for t…Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range (2014)Estimating the sample mean an…Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and…Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions (2002)Hierarchy of evidence: a fram…The scandal of poor medical research (1994)The scandal of poor medical r…Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Estudos de revisão sistemática: um guia para síntese criteriosa da evidência científica (2007)11 Evidence in Management and Organizational Science: Assembling the Field’s Full Weight of Scientific Knowledge Through Syntheses (2008)Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies (2016)Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range (2016)Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect (2019)Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature (2020)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems (2012)Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity (2017)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in the Orthopaedic Literature (2013)Identifying the ‘incredible’! Part 1: assessing the risk of bias in outcomes included in systematic reviews (2019)Identifying the ‘incredible’! Part 2: Spot the difference - a rigorous risk of bias assessment can alter the main findings of a systematic review (2019)Questions and answers about conducting systematic reviews in sport and exercise psychology (2020)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (2007)A guide to prospective meta-analysis (2019)Efficacy of interventions to reduce coercive treatment in mental health services: umbrella review of randomised evidence (2020)Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for mental health outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: an umbrella review (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)PROTOCOL: When and how to replicate systematic reviews (2020)When and how to replicate systematic reviews (2020)More consideration is needed for retracted non-Cochrane systematic reviews in medicine: a systematic review (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Bubble effect: including internet search engines in systematic reviews introduces selection bias and impedes scientific reproducibility (2018)How much distance do humans keep toward robots? Literature review, meta-analysis, and theoretical considerations on personal space in human-robot interaction (2020)La adaptación de las empresas a la realidad COVID: una revisión sistemática (2021)Educational Research, Policymaking and Practice (2002)The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews (2013)Guidelines for Reporting Trial Protocols and Completed Trials Modified Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Extenuating Circumstances (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range11,685 cited
  • 2008Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses2,780 cited
  • 2018Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis1,700 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2002Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions993 cited
  • 1994The scandal of poor medical research897 cited
  • 2017Next-generation systematic reviews: prospective meta-analysis, individual-level data, networks and umbrella reviews189 cited
  • 2018Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? We are not sure88 cited
  • 2016Trusting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: all that glitters is not gold!56 cited
  • 2018Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No22 cited
  • 2015Systematic review hacks for the sports and exercise clinician: five essential methodological elements19 cited
  • 2018Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes19 cited
  • 2017BJSM educational editorials: methods matter14 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work