Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Can Methods Developed for Interpreting Group-level Patient-reported Outcome Data be Applied to Individual Patient Management?

16 references·4 citing·33 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1989Measurement of health status4,979 cited
2003Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life4,692 cited
2007Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes2,372 cited
1995Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?2,206 cited
2002Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures1,505 cited
2000Item Response Theory and Health Outcomes Measurement in the 21st Century868 cited
1999Further Evidence Supporting an SEM-Based Criterion for Identifying Meaningful Intra-Individual Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life861 cited
2006Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change830 cited
2011A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods648 cited
1999Linking Clinical Relevance and Statistical significance in Evaluating Intra-Individual Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life569 cited
1997Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lesson of Cronbach524 cited
2006Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach385 cited
2005Combining Distribution- and Anchor-Based Approaches to Determine Minimally Important Differences

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

383 cited

1999The effectiveness of the use of patient‐based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review368 cited

2002A critical look at transition ratings299 cited

2005Approaches and Recommendations for Estimating Minimally Important Differences for Health-Related Quality of Life Measures250 cited

Cited by

2020Mind the methods of determining minimal important differences: three critical issues to consider73 cited
2021Between-group minimally important change versus individual treatment responders62 cited
2019PROMIS 4-item measures and numeric rating scales efficiently assess SPADE symptoms compared with legacy measures53 cited
2021Triangulation of multiple meaningful change thresholds for patient-reported outcome scores50 cited