Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The development of fast and slow inferential responding: Evidence for a parallel development of rule-based and belief-based intuitions

16 references·9 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2011Thinking, Fast and Slow14,316 cited
2005Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making5,253 cited
2013Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition4,256 cited
1996The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.3,855 cited
1994Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious.2,882 cited
2011The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks1,048 cited
1999Who Is Rational?956 cited
1989The Development of Working Memory in Normally Achieving and Subtypes of Learning Disabled Children842 cited
2011Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles.754 cited
2011Intuition, reason, and metacognition705 cited
2006The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation645 cited
2007Bayesian Rationality556 cited
2006Dual Processing in Reasoning536 cited
2007Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking447 cited
2004An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning444 cited
2005Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

418 cited

Cited by

2022The relationship of types of intuition to thinking styles, beliefs, and cognitions19 cited
2021Think slow, then fast: Does repeated deliberation boost correct intuitive responding?15 cited
2023Examining the role of deliberation in de-bias training7 cited
2025System 2 and cognitive transparency: deliberation helps to justify sound intuitions during reasoning6 cited
2019Who detects and why: How individual differences in cognitive characteristics underpin different types of responses on reasoning tasks?5 cited
2023Robust intuition? Exploring the difference in the strength of intuitions from perspective of attentional bias3 cited
2024Are There Two Kinds of Reasoners?2 cited
2021Defining cognitive sophistication in the development of judgment and decision-making2 cited
2026Overrated intuition and underappreciated deliberation: Reevaluating the Smart System-1 account of reasoning1 cited