SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Editors Should Declare Conflicts of Interest
11 references·7 citing·57 second hop
Editors Should Declare Conflicts of Interest (2019)Editors Should Declare Conflicts of Inter…Quantifying the effect of editor–author relations on manuscript handling times (2017)Quantifying the effect of edi…Hidden connections: Network effects on editorial decisions in four computer science journals (2017)Hidden connections: Network e…Negative results: negative perceptions limit their potential for increasing reproducibility (2015)Negative results: negative pe…Evidence-informed recommendations to reduce dissemination bias in clinical research: conclusions from the OPEN (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) project based on an international consensus meeting (2015)Evidence-informed recommendat…Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review (2014)Problems with Traditional Sci…Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Open access: The true cost of…Networks and productivity: Causal evidence from editor rotations (2013)Networks and productivity: Ca…Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Retracted Science and the Ret…Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Dissemination and publication…Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey (2009)Science journal editors’ view…Publication Decisions Revisited: The Effect of the Outcome of Statistical Tests on the Decision to Publish and Vice Versa (1995)Publication Decisions Revisit…Positionality and Its Problems: Questioning the Value of Reflexivity Statements in Research (2023)Positionality and Its Problem…The art of peer review: Guidelines to become a credible and constructive peer reviewer (2022)The art of peer review: Guide…Do Legitimate Publishers Benefit or Profit from Error, Misconduct or Fraud? (2021)Do Legitimate Publishers Bene…Conflicts of Interest Arising from Simultaneous Service by Editors of Competing Journals or Publishers (2021)Conflicts of Interest Arising…A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers (2021)A credit-like rating system t…Curriculum vitae: challenges and potential solutions (2020)Curriculum vitae: challenges …Establishing Rules for Ethicists and Ethics Organizations in Academic Publishing to Avoid Conflicts of Interest, Favoritism, Cronyism and Nepotism (2019)Establishing Rules for Ethici…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Reproducibility in Science (2014)Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers? (2017)A Systematic Mapping of Negative Effects of Gamification in Education/Learning Systems (2021)Negative effects of gamification in education software: Systematic mapping and practitioner perceptions (2022)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Extent, Awareness and Perception of Dissemination Bias in Qualitative Research: An Explorative Survey (2016)Methods for detecting, quantifying, and adjusting for dissemination bias in meta-analysis are described (2016)Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research required to facilitate assessment within qualitative evidence syntheses (2017)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Facts Are More Important Than Novelty (2014)Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. (2014)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias (2014)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure (1976)Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading (1985)The Role of Connections in Academic Promotions (2015)Social Ties in Academia: A Friend Is a Treasure (2017)The Old Boys’ Club: Schmoozing and the Gender Gap (2023)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Exploratory Research (2020)Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study (1997)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies (2011)Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys (2014)The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Peer review and the publication process (2016)Social Media Scholarship and Alternative Metrics for Academic Promotion and Tenure (2017)Is Peer Review a Good Idea? (2019)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Social Theory and Social Structure. (1969)Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability (1973)Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines (2001)Moving diversity, equity and inclusion research forward with(in) international business: addressing blind spots through critical and reflexive management scholarship (2024)The ironic misfortunes of ‘geographic theory’. Sceptic musings on a sexy oxymoron (2025)Psychology as Narrative: Understanding Our Science as Reflexive Worldmaking (2026)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited
  • 2013Open access: The true cost of science publishing524 cited
  • 1995Publication Decisions Revisited: The Effect of the Outcome of Statistical Tests on the Decision to Publish and Vice Versa453 cited
  • 2011Retracted Science and the Retraction Index405 cited
  • 2013Networks and productivity: Causal evidence from editor rotations177 cited
  • 2014Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review158 cited
  • 2009Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey155 cited
  • 2015Evidence-informed recommendations to reduce dissemination bias in clinical research: conclusions from the OPEN (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) project based on an international consensus meeting57 cited
  • 2015Negative results: negative perceptions limit their potential for increasing reproducibility56 cited
  • 2017Hidden connections: Network effects on editorial decisions in four computer science journals56 cited
  • 2017Quantifying the effect of editor–author relations on manuscript handling times55 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Positionality and Its Problems: Questioning the Value of Reflexivity Statements in Research147 cited
  • 2020Curriculum vitae: challenges and potential solutions31 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2021A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers29 cited
  • 2021Do Legitimate Publishers Benefit or Profit from Error, Misconduct or Fraud?26 cited
  • 2022The art of peer review: Guidelines to become a credible and constructive peer reviewer24 cited
  • 2021Conflicts of Interest Arising from Simultaneous Service by Editors of Competing Journals or Publishers20 cited
  • 2019Establishing Rules for Ethicists and Ethics Organizations in Academic Publishing to Avoid Conflicts of Interest, Favoritism, Cronyism and Nepotism17 cited