SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals
16 references·3 citing·42 second hop
Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals (2019)Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Ran…Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research (2017)Guidelines for reporting meta…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Systematic Review of the Empi…Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Interrater reliability: the k…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)CONSORT for Reporting Randomi…Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals (2005)Epidemiology and reporting of…How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)How important are comprehensi…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2001)Reported Methodologic Quality…Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Randomized, Controlled Trials…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)More Informative Abstracts Re…Reporting quality of abstracts from randomised controlled trials published in leading critical care nursing journals: a methodological quality review (2023)Reporting quality of abstract…Reporting quality for abstracts of randomised trials on child and adolescent depression prevention: a meta-epidemiological study on adherence to CONSORT for abstracts (2022)Reporting quality for abstrac…Abstracts for reports of randomized trials of COVID-19 interventions had low quality and high spin (2021)Abstracts for reports of rand…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. (2008)Fundamental Movement Skills in Children and Adolescents (2010)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on symptoms of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012)Response rates for CBT for anxiety disorders: Need for standardized criteria (2015)Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a systematic review (2018)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist (2014)The CONSORT statement (2019)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Game-based Learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research (2016)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Student Motivation and Associated Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis From Self-Determination Theory (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic19,799 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2000Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs3,561 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2001Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses2,285 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,871 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,858 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials1,426 cited
  • 2003How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study1,181 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,126 cited
  • 2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

670 cited
  • 1990More Informative Abstracts Revisited524 cited
  • 2017Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research514 cited
  • 2005Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals472 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Abstracts for reports of randomized trials of COVID-19 interventions had low quality and high spin16 cited
    • 2023Reporting quality of abstracts from randomised controlled trials published in leading critical care nursing journals: a methodological quality review14 cited
    • 2022Reporting quality for abstracts of randomised trials on child and adolescent depression prevention: a meta-epidemiological study on adherence to CONSORT for abstracts13 cited