SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An Evaluation of Publication Bias in High-Impact Orthopaedic Literature
16 references·2 citing·43 second hop
An Evaluation of Publication Bias in High-Impact Orthopaedic Literature (2019)An Evaluation of Publication Bias in High…An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements Among Orthopaedic Surgery Journals (2018)An Evaluation of Reporting Gu…Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2016)Publication bias in dermatolo…Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals (2016)Publication Bias and Nonrepor…Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in spine surgery, neurosurgery and orthopedics: guidelines for the surgeon scientist. (2015)Systematic reviews and meta-a…How to read a funnel plot in a meta-analysis (2015)How to read a funnel plot in …Publication bias is underreported in systematic reviews published in high-impact-factor journals: metaepidemiologic study (2014)Publication bias is underrepo…Grey Literature Searching for Health Sciences Systematic Reviews: A Prospective Study of Time Spent and Resources Utilized (2014)Grey Literature Searching for…Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits (2013)Searching for grey literature…Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals (2013)Risk of bias of randomized co…Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in the Orthopaedic Literature (2013)Reporting and Methodological …Fighting Publication Bias: Introducing the Negative Results Section (2010)Fighting Publication Bias: In…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Publication Bias in Orthopaedic Research: An Analysis of Scientific Factors Associated with Publication in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) (2008)Publication Bias in Orthopaed…Bias towards publishing positive results in orthopedic and general surgery: a patient safety issue? (2007)Bias towards publishing posit…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Trends in Level of Evidence of Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine, 2010-2020 : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2022)Trends in Level of Evidence o…Reporting Bias in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Related to the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: The Presence of Spin in the Abstract (2022)Reporting Bias in Systematic …Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews (2017)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Education for AI, not AI for Education: The Role of Education and Ethics in National AI Policy Strategies (2021)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Selective Publication of Statistically Significant Results Can Be Effective (2013)A surge of p -values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) (2015)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Nonscientific Factors Associated with Acceptance for Publication in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) (2008)Complication Reporting in Orthopaedic Trials (2009)Current Status of Cost Utility Analyses in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review (2014)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews (2016)Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews Published in High-Impact Pediatrics, Cardiology and Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions (2017)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources (2005)Prospective comparison of search strategies for systematic reviews: an objective approach yielded higher sensitivity than a conceptual one (2016)Evaluation of a new method for librarian‐mediated literature searches for systematic reviews (2017)It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks (2018)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The use of systematic reviews to justify orthopaedic trauma randomized controlled trials: A cross-sectional analysis (2019)A Century of Evolution in Spine Surgery Publications: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Field From 1900 to 2023 (2023)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Research Techniques Made Simple: Assessing Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (2016)The association between five forms of child maltreatment and depressive and anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)Music Therapy in the Treatment of Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2013Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits814 cited
  • 2015How to read a funnel plot in a meta-analysis318 cited
  • 2013Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in the Orthopaedic Literature112 cited
  • 2010Fighting Publication Bias: Introducing the Negative Results Section112 cited
  • 2015Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in spine surgery, neurosurgery and orthopedics: guidelines for the surgeon scientist.104 cited
  • 2008Publication Bias in Orthopaedic Research: An Analysis of Scientific Factors Associated with Publication in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume)99 cited
  • 2014Grey Literature Searching for Health Sciences Systematic Reviews: A Prospective Study of Time Spent and Resources Utilized92 cited
  • 2013Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals83 cited
  • 2007Bias towards publishing positive results in orthopedic and general surgery: a patient safety issue?81 cited
  • 2016Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

76 cited
  • 2014Publication bias is underreported in systematic reviews published in high-impact-factor journals: metaepidemiologic study73 cited
  • 2018An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements Among Orthopaedic Surgery Journals64 cited
  • 2016Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses52 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Trends in Level of Evidence of Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine, 2010-2020 : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis13 cited
    • 2022Reporting Bias in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Related to the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: The Presence of Spin in the Abstract12 cited