References

• 2009Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward1,298 cited
• 2009Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward957 cited
• 2013The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions.631 cited
• 2005Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications482 cited
• 2006Why Experts Make Errors292 cited
• 2008Meta‐analytically Quantifying the Reliability and Biasability of Forensic Experts177 cited
• 2013Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: Visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias151 cited
• 2003Context effects in forensic science: A review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United States146 cited
• 2011The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences139 cited
• 2010Cognitive issues in fingerprint analysis: Inter- and intra-expert consistency and the effect of a ‘target’ comparison135 cited
• 2009A Perspective on Errors, Bias, and Interpretation in the Forensic Sciences and Direction for Continuing Advancement*129 cited
• 2011The need for a research culture in the forensic sciences105 cited
• 2011What role should investigative facts play in the evaluation of scientific evidence?88 cited
• 2012The management of domain irrelevant context information in forensic handwriting examination casework