SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The use of bibliography enriched features for automatic citation screening
6 references·3 citing·41 second hop
The use of bibliography enriched features for automatic citation screening (2019)The use of bibliography enriched features…A critical analysis of studies that address the use of text mining for citation screening in systematic reviews (2016)A critical analysis of studie…Learning to identify relevant studies for systematic reviews using random forest and external information (2015)Learning to identify relevant…Identifying Barriers to the Systematic Literature Review Process (2013)Identifying Barriers to the S…Towards Automating the Initial Screening Phase of a Systematic Review (2010)Towards Automating the Initia…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification (2005)Reducing Workload in Systemat…The landscape of artificial intelligence tools and platforms for evidence synthesis: a scoping review (2026)The landscape of artificial i…Enhancing systematic reviews: An in-depth analysis on the impact of active learning parameter combinations for biomedical abstract screening (2024)Enhancing systematic reviews:…Creating enriched training sets of eligible studies for large systematic reviews: the utility of PubMed's Best Match algorithm (2020)Creating enriched training se…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The American Heritage Word Frequency Book (1973)Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINE (1994)Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews (2010)Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review (2015)Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Integrating the Framing of Clinical Questions via PICO into the Retrieval of Medical Literature for Systematic Reviews (2017)Text mining to support abstract screening for knowledge syntheses: a semi-automated workflow (2021)Screening articles for systematic reviews with ChatGPT (2024)Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (1993)Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews (2004)Systematic literature studies (2012)Text-Mining Techniques and Tools for Systematic Literature Reviews: A Systematic Literature Review (2017)Finding better active learners for faster literature reviews (2018)Defining global health: findings from a systematic review and thematic analysis of the literature (2021)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Automating Risk of Bias Assessment for Clinical Trials (2015)Reproducibility of studies on text mining for citation screening in systematic reviews: Evaluation and checklist (2017)High-performance automated abstract screening with large language model ensembles (2025)Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center (2012)A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering (2013)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Machine learning techniques for the automation of literature reviews and systematic reviews in EFSA (2018)Measuring the impact of screening automation on meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy (2019)Automating Systematic Literature Reviews with Natural Language Processing and Text Mining: A Systematic Literature Review (2023)Reducing systematic review workload through certainty-based screening (2014)A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches (2018)A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)Five Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review (2003)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Machine Learning: Algorithms, Real-World Applications and Research Directions (2021)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2005Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification410 cited
  • 2015Learning to identify relevant studies for systematic reviews using random forest and external information98 cited
  • 2013Identifying Barriers to the Systematic Literature Review Process95 cited
  • 2010Towards Automating the Initial Screening Phase of a Systematic Review60 cited
  • 2016A critical analysis of studies that address the use of text mining for citation screening in systematic reviews41 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Enhancing systematic reviews: An in-depth analysis on the impact of active learning parameter combinations for biomedical abstract screening11 cited
  • 2026The landscape of artificial intelligence tools and platforms for evidence synthesis: a scoping review10 cited
  • 2020Creating enriched training sets of eligible studies for large systematic reviews: the utility of PubMed's Best Match algorithm7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work