Finding the golden mean: the overuse, underuse, and optimal use of character strengths

Ryan M. Niemiec

137 citations0/0 files storedCounselling Psychology Quarterly

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction Optimism, Hope, and Well-being Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies

Abstract

The science of well-being has catalyzed a tremendous amount of research with no area more robust in application and impact than the science of character strengths. As the empirical links between character strengths and positive outcomes rapidly grow, the research around strength imbalances and the use of strengths with problems and conflicts is nascent. The use of character strengths in understanding and handling life suffering as well as emerging from it, is particularly aligned within second wave positive psychology. Areas of particular promise include strengths overuse and strengths underuse, alongside its companion of strengths optimal use. The latter is viewed as the golden mean of character strengths which refers to the expression of the right combination of strengths, to the right degree, and in the right situation. This paper discusses these constructs, maps out each across 24 universal character strengths, and deliberates on reasons for overuse and underuse. Practical strategies for counselors to support clients in the pursuit of optimal strengths use and the management of overuse and underuse are outlined. These include thoughts on wise interventions, the tempering effect, the towing effect, direct questioning, mindfulness, strengths-spotting, the use of a leading strengths model (aware-explore-apply), and eliciting feedback from others.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 137 citations exist upstream.

References

2000Positive psychology: An introduction.2000Positive psychology: An introduction.2005Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions.2004Character strengths and virtues: a handbook and classification 1951Client-Centered Therapy 2005Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification 2004Strengths of Character and Well-Being 2000Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics

Cited by

2021The Practice of Character Strengths: Unifying Definitions, Principles, and Exploration of What’s Soaring, Emerging, and Ripe With Potential in Science and in Practice 2022Character Strengths Across Disabilities: An International Exploratory Study and Implications for Positive Psychiatry and Psychology 2022The dark side of strengths-based approach in the workplace: Perceived strengths-based human resource system spurs unethical pro-organizational behavior 2024What is Known About Development-Oriented Performance Management Practices? A Scoping Review 2020An Empirical Investigation of Leader Identity Formation and Implications for Executive Coaching and Leadership Development

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.