SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Psycho-Physiological Stress Recovery in Outdoor Nature-Based Interventions: A Systematic Review of the Past Eight Years of Research
16 references·0 citing·37 second hopsampled
Psycho-Physiological Stress Recovery in Outdoor Nature-Based Interventions: A Systematic Review of the Past Eight Years of Research (2019)Psycho-Physiological Stress Recovery in O…The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes (2018)The health benefits of the gr…Attention Restoration Theory II: a systematic review to clarify attention processes affected by exposure to natural environments (2018)Attention Restoration Theory …Shinrin-Yoku (Forest Bathing) and Nature Therapy: A State-of-the-Art Review (2017)Shinrin-Yoku (Forest Bathing)…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…Attention Restoration Theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments (2016)Attention Restoration Theory:…The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative affect: A meta-analysis (2015)The effect of contact with na…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…A Review of the Health Benefits of Greenness (2015)A Review of the Health Benefi…The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: A field experiment (2013)The influence of urban green …Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression (2012)Interacting with nature impro…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments (2010)A systematic review of eviden…A Process for Systematically Reviewing the Literature: Providing the Research Evidence for Public Health Nursing Interventions (2004)A Process for Systematically …The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework (1995)The restorative benefits of n…Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments (1991)Stress recovery during exposu…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review (2007)The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting With Nature (2008)Nature and Health (2014)Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance (2017)Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective (2019)Psychological stress and the coping process (1966)Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. (1980)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research (2010)The association between social relationships and depression: A systematic review (2015)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)An approach to environmental psychology (1974)View Through a Window May Influence Recovery from Surgery (1984)Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’ (2014)A power primer. (1992)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Associations between Nature Exposure and Health: A Review of the Evidence (2021)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Residential green space in childhood is associated with lower risk of psychiatric disorders from adolescence into adulthood (2019)Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviours (2020)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,820 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,419 cited
  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,711 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,856 cited
  • 1995The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework7,655 cited
  • 1991Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments6,528 cited
  • 2010A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments2,223 cited
  • 2004A Process for Systematically Reviewing the Literature: Providing the Research Evidence for Public Health Nursing Interventions2,120 cited
  • 2018The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes1,991 cited
  • 2016Attention Restoration Theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments1,112 cited
  • 2013The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: A field experiment1,103 cited
  • 2015A Review of the Health Benefits of Greenness1,065 cited
  • 2015The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative affect: A meta-analysis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

938 cited
  • 2012Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression906 cited
  • 2017Shinrin-Yoku (Forest Bathing) and Nature Therapy: A State-of-the-Art Review774 cited
  • 2018Attention Restoration Theory II: a systematic review to clarify attention processes affected by exposure to natural environments574 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.