SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Cell site analysis: Roles and interpretation · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleCell site analysis: Roles and interpretation

Matt Tart2019

OA

Articlebronze2019

Cell site analysis: Roles and interpretation

Matt Tart · Susan Pope · Robert Bird

11 citations·0/0 files stored·Science & Justice

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Legal processes and jurisprudence Criminal Law and Evidence Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 11 citations exist upstream.

References

1998A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework 1998A model for case assessment and interpretation 2000More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions 1963The Ontogeny of Criminalistics 2006The nature of forensic science opinion—a possible framework to guide thinking and practicce in investigation and in court proceedings 2016Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings

Cited by

2020Opinion evidence in cell site analysis 2022Cell site analysis: Changes to networks with time

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2020Opinion evidence in cell site analysisarticle · 5 shared references 2016Current perspectives in the interpretation of gunshot residues in forensic science: A reviewreview · 4 shared references 2011Forensic science – A true science?article · 4 shared references 2010Helping with inquiries or helping with profits? The trials and tribulations of a technology of forensic reasoningarticle · 4 shared references 2016Development of European standards for evaluative reporting in forensic sciencearticle · 4 shared references 2015Understanding forensic science opinionschapter · 4 shared references

Details

Year2019

Typearticle

Published2019-06-05

VenueScience & Justice

ISSN-L1355-0306

Languageen

Citations11

Files0 public / 0

ShelfLegal processes and jurisprudence

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.scijus.2019.06.005

openalex_workW2949975690

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.