SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Understanding forensic science opinions · Study

ChapterShelves

ChapterUnderstanding forensic science opinions

G. Jackson2015

Chapter2015

Understanding forensic science opinions

17 citations·0/0 files stored·Routledge eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Legal processes and jurisprudence Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Jury Decision Making Processes

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 17 citations exist upstream.

References

1996Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists 1998A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework 1995Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom 1998A model for case assessment and interpretation 2000The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements 2000More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions 2006The nature of forensic science opinion—a possible framework to guide thinking and practicce in investigation and in court proceedings 2006Comparison of confirmation measures

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2016Current perspectives in the interpretation of gunshot residues in forensic science: A reviewreview · 7 shared references 2011If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimonyarticle · 7 shared references 2018A response to “Likelihood ratio as weight of evidence: A closer look” by Lund and Iyerarticle · 7 shared references 2016Bayes and the Lawreview · 6 shared references 2016Development of European standards for evaluative reporting in forensic sciencearticle · 6 shared references 2012E-learning initiatives in forensic interpretation: Report on experiences from current projects and outlookarticle · 6 shared references

Details

Year2015

Typechapter

Published2015-02-17

VenueRoutledge eBooks

Languageen

Citations17

Files0 public / 0

ShelfLegal processes and jurisprudence

Identifiers

doi10.4324/9781843927327.ch16

openalex_workW2496028490

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.