SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Understanding forensic science opinions
14 references·0 citing·22 second hop
Understanding forensic science opinions (2015)Understanding forensic science opinionsEqual prior probabilities: Can one do any better? (2007)Equal prior probabilities: Ca…The nature of forensic science opinion—a possible framework to guide thinking and practicce in investigation and in court proceedings (2006)The nature of forensic scienc…Comparison of confirmation measures (2006)Comparison of confirmation me…Inadequacies of posterior probabilities for the assessment of scientific evidence (2005)Inadequacies of posterior pro…Establishing the most appropriate databases for addressing source level propositions (2004)Establishing the most appropr…The Misquantification of Probative Value. (2003)The Misquantification of Prob…The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements (2000)The impact of the principles …More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions (2000)More on the hierarchy of prop…Probabilistic reasoning in the law (1998)Probabilistic reasoning in th…A model for case assessment and interpretation (1998)A model for case assessment a…A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework (1998)A hierarchy of propositions: …Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (1996)Statistics and the Evaluation…Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom (1995)Interpreting Evidence: Evalua…Avoiding the transposed conditional (1995)Avoiding the transposed condi…A Treatise on Probability (1973)The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence (1992)How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. (1995)On Bayesian Measures of Evidential Support: Theoretical and Empirical Issues (2007)Evaluating science arguments: Evidence, uncertainty, and argument strength. (2009)The role of explanatory considerations in updating (2015)Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. (1987)The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning. (1995)Evidence evaluation: A response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T (2011)Current perspectives in the interpretation of gunshot residues in forensic science: A review (2016)The use of statistics in forensic science (1987)Earmarks as Evidence: A Critical Review (2001)Bayes and the Law (2016)Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: Benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings (2016)Critical review of forensic trace evidence analysis and the need for a new approach (2015)The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions (2015)Building a unified statistical framework for the forensic identification of source problems (2018)What role should investigative facts play in the evaluation of scientific evidence? (2011)Identification of gunshot residue: a critical review (2001)Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems (2011)Intelligence-led crime scene processing. Part I: Forensic intelligence (2009)Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages (2005)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists567 cited
  • 1998A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework454 cited
  • 1995Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom368 cited
  • 1998A model for case assessment and interpretation299 cited
  • 2000The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements209 cited
  • 2000More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions177 cited
  • 2006The nature of forensic science opinion—a possible framework to guide thinking and practicce in investigation and in court proceedings154 cited
  • 2006Comparison of confirmation measures101 cited
  • 1995Avoiding the transposed conditional87 cited
  • 2004Establishing the most appropriate databases for addressing source level propositions63 cited
  • 2007Equal prior probabilities: Can one do any better?38 cited
  • 2005Inadequacies of posterior probabilities for the assessment of scientific evidence36 cited
  • 1998Probabilistic reasoning in the law34 cited
  • 2003The Misquantification of Probative Value.27 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work