Testing the trade‐off between productivity and quality in research activities

Giovanni Abramo · Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo · Flavia Di Costa

37 citations0/0 files storedJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Research, Science, and Academia Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

Abstract In recent years there has been an increasingly pressing need for the evaluation of results from public‐sector research activity, particularly to permit the efficient allocation of ever scarcer resources. Many of the studies and evaluation exercises that have been conducted at the national and international levels emphasize the quality dimension of research output, while neglecting that of productivity. This work is intended to test for the possible existence of correlation between quantity and quality of scientific production and determine whether the most productive researchers are also those that achieve results that are qualitatively better than those of their colleagues. The analysis proposed refers to the entire Italian university system and is based on the observation of production in the hard sciences by more than 26,000 researchers in the period 2001–2005. The results show that the output of more‐productive researchers is superior in quality than that of less‐productive researchers. The relation between productivity and quality results is largely insensitive to the types of indicators or the test methods applied and also seems to differ little among the various disciplines examined.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 37 citations exist upstream.

References

2005Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods 1967Scientific Output and Recognition: A Study in the Operation of the Reward System in Science 2003University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison 2006Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups 2005Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?2004Sleeping Beauties in science 2003Rankings of Academic Journals and Institutions in Economics 1985The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance

Cited by

2016Positive correlation between quality and quantity in academic journals 2011What does the g‐index really measure?2018Scholarly reputation 2010National research assessment exercises: a measure of the distortion of performance rankings when labor input is treated as uniform 2018On scientific validity of Russian science policy

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.