Cited by

• 2016Positive correlation between quality and quantity in academic journals35 cited
• 2011What does the g‐index really measure?34 cited
• 2018Scholarly reputation21 cited
• 2010National research assessment exercises: a measure of the distortion of performance rankings when labor input is treated as uniform17 cited
• 2018On scientific validity of Russian science policy16 cited
• 2019Judicious Use of Bibliometrics to Supplement Peer Evaluations of Research in Kinesiology15 cited
• 2016A comparison of university performance scores and ranks by MNCS and FSS14 cited
• 2024Skewed distributions of scientists’ productivity: a research program for the empirical analysis14 cited
• 2012Productivity analysis of research in Natural Sciences, Technology and Clinical Medicine: an input–output model applied in comparison of Top 300 ranked universities of 4 North European and 4 East Asian countries14 cited
• 2013What proportion of excellent papers makes an institution one of the best worldwide? Specifying thresholds for the interpretation of the results of the SCI mago Institutions Ranking and the Leiden Ranking13 cited
• 2015Quantifying the scientific output of new researchers using the zp-index13 cited
• 2016The information value of early career productivity in mathematics: a ROC analysis of prediction errors in bibliometricly informed decision making12 cited
• 2010A robust benchmark for the h‐ and g‐indexes11 cited
• 2016A comparison of university performance scores and ranks by MNCS and FSS10 cited
• 2022Impact of h-index on author’s rankings: an improvement to the h-index for lower-ranked authors9 cited
• 2016The dispersion of the citation distribution of top scientists’ publications9 cited