SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting Methodology of Neurosurgical Studies Utilizing the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal
11 references·2 citing·45 second hop
Reporting Methodology of Neurosurgical Studies Utilizing the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal (2019)Reporting Methodology of Neurosurgical St…In Reply: Big Data Research in Neurosurgery: A Critical Look at this Popular New Study Design (2018)In Reply: Big Data Research i…Big Data Research in Neurosurgery: A Critical Look at this Popular New Study Design (2017)Big Data Research in Neurosur…The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement (2015)The REporting of studies Cond…Bradford’s law: identification of the core journals for neurosurgery and its subspecialties (2015)Bradford’s law: identificatio…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…Using Pooled Kappa to Summarize Interrater Agreement across Many Items (2008)Using Pooled Kappa to Summari…Enhancing the quality and transparency of health research (2008)Enhancing the quality and tra…Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Strengthening the reporting o…A Checklist for Retrospective Database Studies—Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Retrospective Databases (2003)A Checklist for Retrospective…"Sources of information on specific subjects" by S.C. Bradford (1985)"Sources of information on sp…Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Publications in Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Research Using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Database (2022)Critical Appraisal of the Qua…Appraising the Quality of Reporting of American College of Surgeons NSQIP Emergency General Surgery Studies (2021)Appraising the Quality of Rep…Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Using Bradford's law of scattering to identify the core journals of pediatric surgery (2018)Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis of Stem Cells Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury Based on Web of Science and CiteSpace in the Last 20 Years (2019)A spike in the scientific output on social sciences in Vietnam for recent three years: Evidence from bibliometric analysis in Scopus database (2000–2019) (2020)Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Studying Prescription Drug Use and Outcomes With Medicaid Claims Data (2007)Propuesta de guía para la evaluación económica aplicada a las tecnologías sanitarias (2009)Clinical and biological predictors of psychedelic response in the treatment of psychiatric and addictive disorders: A systematic review (2021)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches (2002)See and tell: Differences between expert and novice teachers’ interpretations of problematic classroom management events (2017)Being a Latinx adolescent under a trump presidency: Analysis of Latinx youth's reactions to immigration politics (2018)Psychedelic therapy for smoking cessation: Qualitative analysis of participant accounts (2018)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely collected health data statement for pharmacoepidemiology (RECORD-PE) (2018)Association of Surgeon-Patient Sex Concordance With Postoperative Outcomes (2021)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force (2022)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Development and use of reporting guidelines for assessing the quality of validation studies of health administrative data (2010)Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Patient Outcomes After Craniotomy for Tumor in Adult Patients in the United States, 1988–2004 (2010)Scientific method: Statistical errors (2014)Big Data Defined: A Practical Review for Neurosurgeons (2019)Increases in female academic productivity and female mentorship highlight sustained progress in previously identified neurosurgical gender disparities (2021)An introduction to informetrics (1992)A Hermeneutic Approach for Conducting Literature Reviews and Literature Searches (2014)An Evidence‐Based Approach to Scoping Reviews (2016)Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors' (2008)Reporting Standards for a Bland–Altman Agreement Analysis: A Review of Methodological Reviews (2020)Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies10,709 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration10,571 cited
  • 2015The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement5,686 cited
  • 1985"Sources of information on specific subjects" by S.C. Bradford708 cited
  • 2003A Checklist for Retrospective Database Studies—Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Retrospective Databases412 cited
  • 2008Enhancing the quality and transparency of health research332 cited
  • 2008Using Pooled Kappa to Summarize Interrater Agreement across Many Items255 cited
  • 2015Bradford’s law: identification of the core journals for neurosurgery and its subspecialties152 cited
  • 2017Big Data Research in Neurosurgery: A Critical Look at this Popular New Study Design59 cited
  • 2018In Reply: Big Data Research in Neurosurgery: A Critical Look at this Popular New Study Design41 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Publications in Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Research Using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Database10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2021
Appraising the Quality of Reporting of American College of Surgeons NSQIP Emergency General Surgery Studies
10 cited