Predatory Publishing and the Response from the Scholarly Community

Julie A. Murphy

10 citations0/0 files storedSerials Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Publishing and Open Access Academic integrity and plagiarism

Abstract

Predatory journals are multiplying rapidly, but awareness is increasing in the scholarly community. Publishers, open access advocates, and researchers are exploring new ways to fight back. This column examines different ways members of the research community have chosen to address the problem of fraudulent publishing.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

References

1998Chronicle of Higher Education 2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?2015‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics 2017What I learned from predatory publishers 2017Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals 2014Predatory Publishing, Questionable Peer Review, and Fraudulent Conferences 2016Discriminating Between Legitimate and Predatory Open Access Journals: Report from the International Federation for Emergency Medicine Research Committee

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.