SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Predatory Publishing and the Response from the Scholarly Community
11 references·0 citing·34 second hop
Predatory Publishing and the Response from the Scholarly Community (2019)Predatory Publishing and the Response fro…What I learned from predatory publishers (2017)What I learned from predatory…Predatory Publishing: What Are the Alternatives to Beall's List? (2017)Predatory Publishing: What Ar…Predatory journals: Beall's List is missed (2017)Predatory journals: Beall's L…Predatory Journals and Perished Articles; a Letter to Editor. (2017)Predatory Journals and Perish…Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals (2017)Identifying predatory or pseu…Discriminating Between Legitimate and Predatory Open Access Journals: Report from the International Federation for Emergency Medicine Research Committee (2016)Discriminating Between Legiti…The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Pub…‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)‘Predatory’ open access: a lo…Predatory Publishing, Questionable Peer Review, and Fraudulent Conferences (2014)Predatory Publishing, Questio…Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review?Chronicle of Higher Education (1998)Chronicle of Higher EducationLittle Science, Big Science (1963)Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (2000)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis (2021)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The Pressure to Publish More and the Scope of Predatory Publishing Activities (2016)The extent of South African authored articles in predatory journals (2017)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)False gold: Safely navigating open access publishing to avoid predatory publishers and journals (2017)Innovating editorial practices: academic publishers at work (2020)An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’ (2021)Predatory journals recruit fake editor (2017)Predatory publishing and cybercrime targeting academics (2018)Perspectives From Authors and Editors in the Biomedical Disciplines on Predatory Journals: Survey Study (2019)Where are we? Using Scopus to map the literature at the intersection between artificial intelligence and research on crime (2020)The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics (2016)The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence (2025)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health (2019)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them (2020)Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)The storm around Beall’s List: a review of issues raised by Beall’s critics over his criteria of identifying predatory journals and publishers (2019)How Frequently Are Articles in Predatory Open Access Journals Cited (2020)Welcome to America? International student perceptions of discrimination (2006)A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences (2012)Unseen disadvantage: How American universities' focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1998Chronicle of Higher Education4,261 cited
  • 2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era1,239 cited
  • 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
  • 2015‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics818 cited
  • 2017What I learned from predatory publishers306 cited
  • 2017Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals146 cited
  • 2014Predatory Publishing, Questionable Peer Review, and Fraudulent Conferences126 cited
  • 2016Discriminating Between Legitimate and Predatory Open Access Journals: Report from the International Federation for Emergency Medicine Research Committee76 cited
  • 2017Predatory Publishing: What Are the Alternatives to Beall's List?68 cited
  • 2017Predatory journals: Beall's List is missed63 cited
  • 2017Predatory Journals and Perished Articles; a Letter to Editor.14 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work