Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The language of peer review reports on articles published in the BMJ, 2014–2017: an observational study

7 references·6 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1990The Effects of Blinding on the Quality of Peer Review261 cited
1990The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial216 cited
2008Evaluative language in peer review referee reports114 cited
2009Peer review process in medical research publications: Language and content comments107 cited
2010Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes80 cited
2009A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ?47 cited
2014Prepublication histories and open peer review at The BMJ34 cited

Cited by

2024Behavioral consequences of second-person pronouns in written communications between authors and reviewers of scientific papers18 cited
2021Home country bias in academic publishing: A case study of the New England Journal of Medicine15 cited
2022Does peer review improve the statistical content of manuscripts? A study on 27 467 submissions to four journals14 cited
2023The academic status of reviewers predicts their language use14 cited
2024Textual features of peer review predict top-cited papers: An interpretable machine learning perspective13 cited
2022Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: Revising a Peer-reviewed Manuscript11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work