SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What attributes should be included in a discrete choice experiment related to health technologies? A systematic literature review
16 references·0 citing·45 second hop
What attributes should be included in a discrete choice experiment related to health technologies? A systematic literature review (2019)What attributes should be included in a d…Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature (2014)Discrete Choice Experiments i…Patients’ preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A conjoint analysis (2012)Patients’ preferences for tre…Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature (2010)Discrete choice experiments i…Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health – How are Studies being Designed and Reported? (2010)Conjoint Analysis Application…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Labeled versus Unlabeled Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: An Application to Colorectal Cancer Screening (2009)Labeled versus Unlabeled Disc…Rationalising the ‘irrational’: a think aloud study of discrete choice experiment responses (2008)Rationalising the ‘irrational…Exploring the social value of health‐care interventions: a stated preference discrete choice experiment (2008)Exploring the social value of…Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making (2008)Conducting Discrete Choice Ex…Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments (2008)Comparing welfare estimates f…Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care (2007)Using Discrete Choice Experim…A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms (2005)A Typology of Public Engageme…QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature (2004)QALY maximisation and people'…Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. (2003)Using discrete choice experim…Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques (2001)Eliciting public preferences …Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior (1972)EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life (1990)Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (2005)The Effect of Including an Opt-Out Option in Discrete Choice Experiments (2014)Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making—An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force (2016)Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making—Emerging Good Practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force (2016)A New Approach to Consumer Theory (1966)A New Approach to Consumer Theory (1976)Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software (2017)Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future (2018)How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity (2018)The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research (1968)SERVQUAL: A multiple-Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality (1988)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Deleting ‘irrational’ responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences? (2006)A new method for scoring additive multi‐attribute value models using pairwise rankings of alternatives (2008)Using the Nominal Group Technique: how to analyse across multiple groups (2014)Intergenerational Equity: An Exploration of the ‘Fair Innings’ Argument (1997)Understanding DALYs (1997)Weighting and valuing quality-adjusted life-years using stated preference methods: preliminary results from the Social Value of a QALY Project (2010)Pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs: the need for more transparency (2011)Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Technology Assessment (2012)Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level (1998)Stated Choice Methods (2000)Applied Choice Analysis (2005)Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide (2015)Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force (2016)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk (1988)Constructing Experimental Designs for Discrete-Choice Experiments: Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force (2013)Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A Ladder Of Citizen Participation (1969)Citizen Participation in Planning: The Relationship Between Objectives and Techniques (1979)Group versus individual performance: Are N + 1 heads better than one? (1982)Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research (2011)Participatory Democracy Revisited (2012)Building Trust and Reinforcing Democracy (2022)Discrete choice experiments in health care (2004)Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis. (2006)A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
  • 2005A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms1,869 cited
  • 2008Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making1,699 cited
  • 2010Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature1,327 cited
  • 2014Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature856 cited
  • 2007Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care761 cited
  • 2001Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques641 cited
  • 2003Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections.627 cited
  • 2004QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature431 cited
  • 2010Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health – How are Studies being Designed and Reported?363 cited
  • 2008Rationalising the ‘irrational’: a think aloud study of discrete choice experiment responses249 cited
  • 2009Labeled versus Unlabeled Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: An Application to Colorectal Cancer Screening225 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2008Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments164 cited
  • 2008Exploring the social value of health‐care interventions: a stated preference discrete choice experiment148 cited
  • 2012Patients’ preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A conjoint analysis139 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.