SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Pragmatic methods for reviewing exceptionally large bodies of evidence: systematic mapping review and overview of systematic reviews using lung cancer survival as an exemplar
16 references·1 citing·48 second hop
Pragmatic methods for reviewing exceptionally large bodies of evidence: systematic mapping review and overview of systematic reviews using lung cancer survival as an exemplar (2019)Pragmatic methods for reviewing exception…Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2—risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence (2018)Toward a comprehensive eviden…An introduction to overviews of reviews: planning a relevant research question and objective for an overview (2018)An introduction to overviews …Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 1—purpose, eligibility, search and data extraction (2017)Toward a comprehensive eviden…The State of Lung Cancer Research: A Global Analysis (2016)The State of Lung Cancer Rese…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas (2016)Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool f…All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more (2015)All in the Family: systematic…Judging the quality of evidence in reviews of prognostic factor research: adapting the GRADE framework (2013)Judging the quality of eviden…Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors (2013)Assessing Bias in Studies of …The Aarhus statement: improving design and reporting of studies on early cancer diagnosis (2012)The Aarhus statement: improvi…Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach (2012)Evidence summaries: the evolu…Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions (2011)Methodology in conducting a s…AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)AMSTAR is a reliable and vali…Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Cochrane Database of Systemat…A Brief History of Research Synthesis (2002)A Brief History of Research S…Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables (2001)Systematic reviews of evaluat…Types and associated methodologies of overviews of reviews in health care: a methodological study with published examples (2022)Types and associated methodol…Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints (1998)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Meta‐Analysis in Medical Research (2005)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies (2019)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Risks of all-cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: a meta-review (2014)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)Inclusion of quasi-experimental studies in systematic reviews of health systems research (2014)The use of GRADE approach in systematic reviews of animal studies (2016)How to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic model studies (2022)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview (2014)An overview of systematic reviews on the public health consequences of social isolation and loneliness (2017)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews (2020)Occurrence, prevention, and management of the psychological effects of emerging virus outbreaks on healthcare workers: rapid review and meta-analysis (2020)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions (2001)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)The Model of Pathways to Treatment: Conceptualization and integration with existing theory (2012)Cancer suspicion in general practice, urgent referral and time to diagnosis: a population-based GP survey and registry study (2014)Why do People Avoid Medical Care? A Qualitative Study Using National Data (2014)A Comprehensive Review and a Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Internet-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions (2008)The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses (2012)Social determinants of mental health (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews4,527 cited
  • 2013Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors3,273 cited
  • 2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews1,756 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2012Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach1,232 cited
  • 2011Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions1,227 cited
  • 2012The Aarhus statement: improving design and reporting of studies on early cancer diagnosis781 cited
  • 2001Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables757 cited
  • 2002A Brief History of Research Synthesis552 cited
  • 2013Judging the quality of evidence in reviews of prognostic factor research: adapting the GRADE framework531 cited
  • 2016Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas326 cited
  • 2018An introduction to overviews of reviews: planning a relevant research question and objective for an overview314 cited
  • 2015All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more288 cited
  • 2016The State of Lung Cancer Research: A Global Analysis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

234 cited
  • 2017Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 1—purpose, eligibility, search and data extraction184 cited
  • 2018Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2—risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence139 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Types and associated methodologies of overviews of reviews in health care: a methodological study with published examples15 cited