Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Evaluating the stability, validity, and utility of hierarchies produced by the Social Interaction Preference Assessment

16 references·1 citing·37 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2013Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders116,254 cited
2014Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.15,103 cited
2012Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research.4,239 cited
1992A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND DISABILITIES1,626 cited
1996EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PRESENTATION FORMAT FOR ASSESSING REINFORCER PREFERENCES1,334 cited
1996Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification.335 cited
2008A Comparison of Most-to-Least and Least-to-Most Prompting on the Acquisition of Solitary Play Skills166 cited
1999AN EVALUATION OF THE PROPERTIES OF ATTENTION AS REINFORCEMENT FOR DESTRUCTIVE AND APPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR93 cited
1999ANALYSIS OF ACTIVITY PREFERENCES AS A FUNCTION OF DIFFERENTIAL CONSEQUENCES86 cited
2003RESPONSE‐RESTRICTION ANALYSIS: I. ASSESSMENT OF ACTIVITY PREFERENCES71 cited
2014Evaluation of assessment methods for identifying social reinforcers67 cited
2007Assessment protocol for identifying preferred social consequences65 cited
2012ASSESSING PREFERENCE FOR SOCIAL INTERACTION IN CHILDREN DIAGNOSED WITH AUTISM52 cited
2012Assessing preference for social interactions

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

48 cited

2005ASSESSING OBJECT-TO-PICTURE AND PICTURE-TO-OBJECT MATCHING AS PREREQUISITE SKILLS FOR PICTORIAL PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS47 cited

2015Comparison of edible and leisure reinforcers41 cited

Cited by

2021Comparing the results of one‐session, two‐session, and three‐session MSWO preference assessments26 cited