SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Cognitive bias and decision aid use under stressful conditions
16 references·2 citing·25 second hop
Cognitive bias and decision aid use under stressful conditions (2019)Cognitive bias and decision aid use under…User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1 (2003)User Acceptance of Informatio…Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1 (2003)Trust and TAM in Online Shopp…The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update (2003)The DeLone and McLean Model o…Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model (2003)Consumer Acceptance of Electr…Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (2003)Common method biases in behav…Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model (2002)Why do people use information…A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies (2000)A Theoretical Extension of th…Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse (1997)Humans and Automation: Use, M…Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance (1995)Task-Technology Fit and Indiv…Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable (1992)Information Systems Success: …Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior (1991)Predicting User Intentions: C…User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models (1989)User Acceptance of Computer T…Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology (1989)Perceived Usefulness, Perceiv…Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Judgment under Uncertainty: H…Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975)Belief, Attitude, Intention a…Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: H…Conversational Agent Dynamics with Minority Opinion and Cognitive Conflict in Small‐Group Decision‐Making (2024)Conversational Agent Dynamics…Wearable Neurofeedback Acceptance Model: An Investigation within Academic Settings to Explore a Multimodal Framework for Student Stress and Anxiety Management (2023)Wearable Neurofeedback Accept…Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness (1972)Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability (1973)On the psychology of prediction. (1973)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk (1988)Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty (1992)Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models (1995)The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action (1997)Design science in information systems research (2004)Design Science in Information Systems Research1 (2004)Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions (2008)Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. (1982)A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling (2014)Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology1 (2012)Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place (2015)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects (1986)Structural Equations with Latent Variables. (1991)Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It (2011)Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM (2015)Review : Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations And Research Issues1,2 (2001)Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research (1988)Epistemic Injustice (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.81,863 cited
  • 1989Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology68,271 cited
  • 2003User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View144,945 cited
  • 1975Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research36,736 cited
  • 1974Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases28,742 cited
  • 1989User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models25,696 cited
  • 2000A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies22,991 cited
  • 1975Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases22,647 cited
  • 2003The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update11,772 cited
  • 1992Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable10,674 cited
  • 2003Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model18,618 cited
  • 1995Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance5,991 cited
  • 2003Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model5,710 cited
  • 1997Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse4,525 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 1991Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior4,215 cited
  • 2002Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model4,200 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Wearable Neurofeedback Acceptance Model: An Investigation within Academic Settings to Explore a Multimodal Framework for Student Stress and Anxiety Management2 cited
    • 2024Conversational Agent Dynamics with Minority Opinion and Cognitive Conflict in Small‐Group Decision‐Making1 cited