Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Attitudes toward standardized assessment tools and their use among clinicians in a public mental health service

10 references·2 citing·49 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1999Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives108,592 cited
2003Is It Time for Clinicians to Routinely Track Patient Outcome? A Meta-Analysis.607 cited
2005Evidence-Based Assessment of Anxiety and Its Disorders in Children and Adolescents553 cited
2013Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: Benefits, challenges, and solutions494 cited
2018Collecting and delivering progress feedback: A meta-analysis of routine outcome monitoring.395 cited
2004The Use of Outcome Measures by Psychologists in Clinical Practice.305 cited
2003Clinicians and outcome measurement: What's the use?298 cited
2016Monitoring Treatment Progress and Providing Feedback is Viewed Favorably but Rarely Used in Practice249 cited
2010Understanding Barriers to Evidence-Based Assessment: Clinician Attitudes Toward Standardized Assessment Tools237 cited
2002Psychiatrists in the UK do not use outcomes measures230 cited

Cited by

2023Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) and Feedback: Research Review and Recommendations173 cited
2020The interRAI Suite of Mental Health Assessment Instruments: An Integrated System for the Continuum of Care125 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work