Debunking the Stanford Prison Experiment.

Thibault Le Texier

113 citations0/0 files storedAmerican Psychologist

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology Psychology Research and Bibliometrics Psychology of Social Influence

Abstract

The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) is one of psychology's most famous studies. It has been criticized on many grounds, and yet a majority of textbook authors have ignored these criticisms in their discussions of the SPE, thereby misleading both students and the general public about the study's questionable scientific validity. Data collected from a thorough investigation of the SPE archives and interviews with 15 of the participants in the experiment further question the study's scientific merit. These data are not only supportive of previous criticisms of the SPE, such as the presence of demand characteristics, but provide new criticisms of the SPE based on heretofore unknown information. These new criticisms include the biased and incomplete collection of data, the extent to which the SPE drew on a prison experiment devised and conducted by students in one of Zimbardo's classes 3 months earlier, the fact that the guards received precise instructions regarding the treatment of the prisoners, the fact that the guards were not told they were subjects, and the fact that participants were almost never completely immersed by the situation. Possible explanations of the inaccurate textbook portrayal and general misperception of the SPE's scientific validity over the past 5 decades, in spite of its flaws and shortcomings, are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 113 citations exist upstream.

References

1962On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications.2019The Seven Deadly Sins of Psychology: A Manifesto for Reforming the Culture of Scientific Practice

Cited by

2020For the Greater Good? The Devastating Ripple Effects of the Covid-19 Crisis 2022Idiographic Psychology: From Forms of Inference to Levels of Analysis, and Back Again 2020The archival turn in classical social psychology: Some recent reports 2023Indoctrination in Introduction to Psychology 2023A Compass for What Matters: Applying Virtue Ethics to Information Behavior 2023Authoritarianism, Ambivalence, Ambiguity 2025Debunking “When Prophecy Fails”2023Promoting Liberal Education Through Introductory Psychology: The Perspective-Based Approach

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.