Article2019

Corporate social responsibility practices incomes and outcomes: Stakeholders' pressure, culture, employee commitment, corporate reputation, and brand performance. A Polish–German cross‐country study

111 citations0/0 files storedCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Corporate Identity and Reputation

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to compare employee perception of corporate social responsibility (CSR) practice incomes and outcomes in the construction industry in Poland and Germany. It proposes a model that examines the influence of stakeholder pressure, culture, and CSR practices on company brand performance, reputation, and employee identification. The findings suggest that the structure of relationships varies for project‐managed construction companies in a developed country such as Germany and a rapidly transformed Poland. The structural equation modeling method was adopted to analyze the differences between the structures of relationships using AMOS and Process software. The key finding reveals that stakeholder pressure can lead to consistent CSR‐oriented system in the business environment. This study was first conducted in 2018 and then replicated in 2019 to confirm the results with 1,674 cases. The novelty essence is the comparison of the Polish and German structure of CSR practice incomes and outcomes related to employee perception.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 111 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.1986Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects 2011Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It 1974An Index of Factorial Simplicity 2001Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs.1995A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance 2001Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective 2007Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility

Cited by

2023The role of corporate social responsibility activities in employees’ perception of brand reputation and brand equity 2020Social and environmental reporting, sustainable development and institutional voids: Evidence from a developing country 2023Reinvigorating research on sustainability reporting in the construction industry: A systematic review and future research agenda 2021RETRACTED: Research of influence mechanism of corporate social responsibility for smart cities on consumers' purchasing intention

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.